Clin2
NCT07004634Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing Drain Types After Minimally Invasive Esophageal Cancer Surgery

Esophageal CancerDrainage/MethodsPostoperative Pain

Part of Cancer, Digestive system, Pain clinical trials.

This study compares two different ways of placing drains after minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. It aims to find which method helps you recover better and with fewer complications.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
75 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have esophageal cancer that needs surgery with incisions in your neck, chest, and belly.
  • You are in reasonably good health (classified as ASA I, II, or III by your doctor).
  • You do not have chronic pain or take strong painkillers before surgery.
  • You do not have severe heart or lung problems (for example, your lung function is less than 50% of normal).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07434739Not yet recruiting
Pain relief after minimally invasive esophagectomy: catheter vs. epidural

This study compares two ways to manage pain after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a paravertebral catheter (a small tube near the spine) versus epidural analgesia (a tube in the back). The goal is to see which method provides better pain relief with fewer side effects.

Lille
NCT05504265Recruiting· Phase 2/Phase 3
Pain control methods during minimally invasive esophagus surgery

This study compares different ways to control pain around the time of minimally invasive esophagus surgery. It may help find a method that controls pain better and improves recovery after surgery.

Beijing
NCT07125248Recruiting
One vs. Two Drains After Esophageal Cancer Surgery

This study is for people with esophageal cancer who are having open surgery to remove the esophagus. It compares using one chest drain tube versus two to see which leads to a better recovery.

Peshawar, Khyberpukhtunkhwa
NCT06820736Recruiting
Comparing drain methods after low back surgery

This study compares two different methods of using a tube (drain) to remove fluid after low back surgery. It aims to see which drain technique leads to fewer problems or better recovery for people having one or two levels of back surgery.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
NCT06147180Not yet recruiting
Comparing minimally invasive vs. open surgery for esophageal cancer

This study looks at how different types of surgery for esophageal cancer affect long-term survival and quality of life. It compares a less invasive technique (using small incisions) with traditional open surgery to see which one might be better for patients.

Ji'nan, Shandong
NCT06690112Recruiting
Early drain removal after stomach cancer surgery

This pilot study tests whether it is safe to remove the surgical drain early in patients with a specific amount of output after stomach cancer surgery. It may help reduce discomfort and hospital stay for patients whose drain output is moderate.

Seoul

Hear when a new Esophageal Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.