Clin2
NCT04056013Possibly a fitRecruiting

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for simple cuts

Traumatic Lacerations

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This trial compares two types of stitches after a single cut that needs simple interrupted sutures: absorbable stitches versus stitches that must be removed. It may help find which option leads to better healing and appearance after 3 months.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
96 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You’re 18 years old or older
  • You have one cut (laceration) on your trunk or arm/leg that needs stitches
  • The cut is longer than 2 centimeters
  • The wound closure plan is simple “interrupted” stitches (not another stitch method)
  • The cut is not too complex or high-risk for infection or poor healing

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07639372Recruiting
Fast vs. slow-dissolving stitches for large surgical wounds

This study compares two types of stitches that dissolve at different speeds in people having skin surgery with larger cuts. Researchers want to see which type heals better and causes less tension on the wound.

Lanzhou, Gansu
NCT06043414Not yet recruiting
Stitches vs. special stitches for emergency belly surgery

This trial compares two types of stitches used to close the belly after emergency surgery. It aims to see if one type leads to fewer problems like wound infections or hernias.

Los Angeles, California
NCT06550999Not yet recruiting
Sticky strips vs. stitches for facial cuts

This study compares using sticky strips (like medical tape) versus stitches to close small, simple cuts on the face. It looks at how satisfied patients are with the look of the scar and the overall experience.

Orange, California
NCT07167199Not yet recruiting
Absorbable staples vs. conventional skin closure for C-sections

This study compares two ways to close the skin after a C-section: absorbable staples (which dissolve on their own) versus regular stitches or staples. It aims to see which method works better for healing and scarring.

Falls Church, Virginia
NCT07280975Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of stitches for belly surgery closure

This trial is studying whether one type of stitch (polyglactin) works better than another (polypropylene) for closing the belly wall after abdominal surgery. It may help reduce the risk of hernias or other complications.

Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
NCT07498361Recruiting
Comparing absorbable stitches in wisdom tooth removal

This trial compares two types of dissolving stitches (sutures) used after wisdom tooth surgery to see which works better. It may help your mouth heal faster with fewer problems.

Padua, Padua

Hear when a new Traumatic Lacerations trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.