Compare two uterus-support surgeries for uterine prolapse
Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.
This trial compares two surgical ways to support the uterus without removing it: a vaginal approach versus a laparoscopic (camera) approach. It may help you choose the method that best improves uterine prolapse symptoms and function.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are older than 21 years old.
- You have uterine prolapse that is at least stage 2 (based on a pelvic exam measurement called POP-Q).
- You are willing to have a surgery that keeps the uterus (uterus-preserving surgery).
- You can be medically cleared for anesthesia and surgery after pre-op evaluation.
- You are able and willing to complete questionnaires during the study.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two types of vaginal surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse (when pelvic organs drop out of place). The goal is to see which method works better and has fewer side effects. You may qualify if you have prolapse symptoms and are not planning to preserve your uterus.
This trial compares two surgical procedures to treat uterine prolapse (a symptom-causing “bulge” or dropping of pelvic organs). You may be placed into one of the surgery groups, and one option involves using a synthetic support material (mesh).
This trial compares two minimally invasive surgical techniques (laparoscopic lateral suspension and V-NOTES lateral suspension using the Salman Ketenci Gencer method) to repair severe pelvic organ prolapse. It aims to see which approach leads to better recovery and outcomes for patients who are sexually active.
This study tests two types of laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse, a condition where pelvic organs drop into the vaginal area. One method uses mesh to support the vaginal top, and the other repairs the front or back vaginal wall. It aims to find which approach works best.
This study tests a surgery called uterosacral ligament suspension to treat uterine prolapse. The goal is to see how well it works when the uterus is kept in place, using small incisions (laparoscopy), and it may be a good option if you have prolapse and don't want more children.
This trial compares two minimally-invasive surgical techniques to fix pelvic organ prolapse. It aims to see which method works better and has fewer side effects.
Hear when a new Pelvic Organ Prolapse trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.