Compare two uterus-support surgeries for uterine prolapse
Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.
This trial compares two surgical ways to support the uterus without removing it: a vaginal approach versus a laparoscopic (camera) approach. It may help you choose the method that best improves uterine prolapse symptoms and function.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are older than 21 years old.
- You have uterine prolapse that is at least stage 2 (based on a pelvic exam measurement called POP-Q).
- You are willing to have a surgery that keeps the uterus (uterus-preserving surgery).
- You can be medically cleared for anesthesia and surgery after pre-op evaluation.
- You are able and willing to complete questionnaires during the study.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two surgical techniques to repair pelvic organ prolapse (when organs like the bladder or uterus push into the vagina). One method uses a synthetic mesh, and the other uses a natural stitch to hold the organs in place. Both surgeries involve removing the uterus (if you still have one), and the goal is to see which approach works better and has fewer complications.
This study compares a surgical technique to treat uterine prolapse (when the uterus drops into the vaginal canal) by using stitches to attach it to a strong ligament in the pelvis. The goal is to see if this approach is a good option for women who want to keep their uterus and have no plans for future pregnancies.
This study compares two surgical techniques to repair pelvic organ prolapse (when organs like the bladder or bowel sag into the vaginal area). It aims to see which method gives better support with fewer risks, potentially offering you a lasting fix.
This study tests two types of laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse, a condition where pelvic organs drop into the vaginal area. One method uses mesh to support the vaginal top, and the other repairs the front or back vaginal wall. It aims to find which approach works best.
This trial compares two minimally-invasive surgical techniques to fix pelvic organ prolapse. It aims to see which method works better and has fewer side effects.
This study compares two surgical approaches for women with moderate-to-severe uterine prolapse (when the uterus drops into the vagina). The trial tests whether keeping your uterus during surgery works as well as removing it, with follow-up care over time.
Hear when a new Pelvic Organ Prolapse trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.