Clin2
NCT05943444Possibly a fitRecruiting

Compares two ways to preserve bowel function after rectal surgery

Rectal NeoplasmsLow Anterior Resection SyndromeAnastomotic LeakQuality of Life

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial compares two surgical techniques to see which one better preserves anal function after surgery for low rectal cancer. If you may be eligible for anal-preserving surgery, it may help your care team choose the approach that best protects bowel control.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
256 people
Ages
18 years to 75 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 to 75 years old
  • Your cancer has been confirmed as rectal cancer on scans and pathology, and it is close to the anal area (≤ 3 cm from the lower tumor edge to the dentate line by MRI)
  • Before surgery, you do not have local emergencies like severe blockage, active bleeding, or spread into nearby anal muscles
  • Your care team (a group of specialists) thinks you may be able to have anal-preserving surgery
  • You are healthy enough for surgery and anesthesia, and doctors expect a clean cancer removal (an “R0 resection”)

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07346534Enrolling by invitation
Comparing reinforced vs. standard bowel connection in rectal cancer surgery

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the bowel after removing rectal cancer using keyhole surgery. It aims to see if a reinforced connection (with extra support) helps prevent leaks better than the standard method.

Shanghai
NCT06717854Not yet recruiting
Enema technique to prevent bowel issues after rectal cancer surgery

This study tests whether giving a special enema in two directions (from above and below) after specific rectal cancer surgery can help prevent a common problem called low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which affects bowel control and quality of life. If you're having this surgery, the trial may help you keep better bowel function.

Chengdu, Sichuan
NCT06442215Recruiting
Choosing the best surgery for rectal cancer

This trial compares surgical techniques for removing rectal cancer (anterior resection). It looks at patients with adenocarcinoma who are scheduled for surgery to find the best approach.

Girona
NCT06495853Not yet recruiting· Phase 2
Reinforcing rectal anastomosis to prevent complications

This trial tests if adding a continuous circular reinforcement to the surgical connection (anastomosis) during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery can reduce complications. It is for people with mid to upper rectal cancer that can be removed by surgery.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT06567756Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgeries for low rectal cancer to protect anal function

This trial compares two types of surgery for low rectal cancer to see which one better preserves your ability to control bowel movements. It is for people whose cancer has not spread and who have good anal function before surgery.

NCT07369531Recruiting
Stoma-free survival after new anal-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer

This study compares a two-stage surgical technique (Turnbull-Cutait pull-through) to standard surgery for people with low rectal cancer. The goal is to see which approach helps more patients avoid a permanent stoma (bag) after surgery.

Changchun, Jilin

Hear when a new Rectal Neoplasms trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.