Clin2
NCT05943444Possibly a fitRecruiting

Compares two ways to preserve bowel function after rectal surgery

Rectal NeoplasmsLow Anterior Resection SyndromeAnastomotic LeakQuality of Life

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial compares two surgical techniques to see which one better preserves anal function after surgery for low rectal cancer. If you may be eligible for anal-preserving surgery, it may help your care team choose the approach that best protects bowel control.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
256 people
Ages
18 years to 75 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 to 75 years old
  • Your cancer has been confirmed as rectal cancer on scans and pathology, and it is close to the anal area (≤ 3 cm from the lower tumor edge to the dentate line by MRI)
  • Before surgery, you do not have local emergencies like severe blockage, active bleeding, or spread into nearby anal muscles
  • Your care team (a group of specialists) thinks you may be able to have anal-preserving surgery
  • You are healthy enough for surgery and anesthesia, and doctors expect a clean cancer removal (an “R0 resection”)

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07346534Enrolling by invitation
Comparing reinforced vs. standard bowel connection in rectal cancer surgery

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the bowel after removing rectal cancer using keyhole surgery. It aims to see if a reinforced connection (with extra support) helps prevent leaks better than the standard method.

Shanghai
NCT06758830Recruiting· Phase 2/Phase 3
Total neoadjuvant therapy vs surgery for rectal cancer

This trial tests whether a full course of chemotherapy and radiation before any surgery (called total neoadjuvant therapy) can help you avoid surgery and preserve your rectum. It is for people with a specific early stage of rectal cancer that has not spread.

Vilnius
NCT04087421Recruiting· Phase 3
Transanal irrigation vs glycerol suppositories for LARS

This trial compares two ways to help bowel control in people with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after low rectal surgery. It aims to see which option works better when standard treatments have not helped enough.

Aarhus
NCT06036862Recruiting
Treating rectal narrowing with a tube through the anus

This trial tests a procedure using a thin, flexible tube with a camera to fix a narrowing (stenosis) where the colon is reconnected after rectal cancer surgery. It may help people who have trouble with bowel movements due to this narrowing.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT06567756Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgeries for low rectal cancer to preserve bowel control

This trial compares two surgical techniques to remove low rectal cancer while aiming to preserve bowel control. It may help you keep better anal function after surgery.

NCT07821437Not yet recruiting
Comparison of two methods to protect bowel healing after rectal cancer surgery

This trial compares two ways to protect the healing connection in your bowel after rectal cancer surgery. One method uses a thin tube placed through your nose down to the small intestine to divert stool away from the surgery site before the operation, while the other creates a temporary opening in the abdomen (an ileostomy) during the surgery. The goal is to see if the tube works as well as the ileostomy in preventing leaks and improving recovery.

Hear when a new Rectal Neoplasms trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.