Early surgery vs 3-day waiting for bowel blockage
Part of Digestive system clinical trials.
This trial compares two approaches for a sudden blockage in the small intestine caused by scar tissue: having surgery right away versus waiting up to three days with non-surgical care. It aims to see which approach leads to better outcomes, so you and your doctor can make a more informed choice.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are being admitted to the hospital for a sudden blockage in your small intestine caused by scar tissue
- A CT scan has confirmed this type of blockage
- You are 18 years or older
- You have health insurance (social security)
- You are able to understand French and give your informed consent
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial studies an approach that uses a blood test called procalcitonin to help doctors choose the best treatment for an acute small-bowel blockage caused by scar tissue (adhesions). It may help avoid unnecessary procedures and speed the right care when doctors are deciding what to do next.
This trial studies whether using contrast dye (a special substance seen on scans) helps in treating people with a specific type of small-bowel blockage. It may help doctors make better decisions without needing emergency surgery.
This study tests whether a special drink (water-soluble contrast) given through a tube can help stimulate the intestines and clear a blockage without surgery. If it works, you might avoid an operation.
This study tests if an ER doctor can use a bedside ultrasound to quickly rule out a bowel blockage, so you might avoid a CT scan. You'll get the ultrasound plus a CT scan to compare how well the ultrasound works.
This trial compares surgery versus continued monitoring for people who have recently recovered from a bowel blockage caused by scar tissue. The goal is to see if surgery reduces the chance of another blockage.
This trial compares the effectiveness of placing a nasogastric tube versus not placing one for treating small bowel obstructions caused by adhesions. It aims to see if the tube is really needed for patients who do not have complications.
Hear when a new Small Bowel Obstruction trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.