Comparing two surgeries for early pregnancy loss after IVF
Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.
This trial compares two surgical methods (suction curettage vs. hysteroscopy) for removing early pregnancy tissue in women who conceived through IVF, to see which is safer and has fewer side effects.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 5 and 10 weeks pregnant and the pregnancy has ended.
- You got pregnant through IVF (in vitro fertilization).
- You can read and write in Hebrew.
- You are not currently having heavy bleeding or signs of infection.
- You have not had 3 or more previous miscarriages.
- You have not had 3 or more previous C-sections.
- You do not have an unusual shape of the uterus or a history of certain uterine surgeries.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two surgical procedures for removing pregnancy tissue after an early miscarriage: hysteroscopic resection and manual vacuum aspiration. It helps you understand which method might work best.
This study compares two outpatient procedures—hysteroscopy and suction—to remove retained pregnancy tissue after a miscarriage in the first 3 months. The goal is to find which method works best and is safest for people who choose surgical treatment.
This trial compares two ways to treat a first-trimester miscarriage that needs surgery: one is done in a clinic using a handheld suction device, the other is done in an operating room using electric suction. The study looks at costs and how well each method works.
This trial studies the best way to remove leftover pregnancy tissue after a first-trimester miscarriage. It compares approaches guided by a camera procedure in the uterus to see which helps most, especially for people who want to get pregnant again soon.
This trial compares operative hysteroscopy performed in the operating room versus an outpatient setting to treat uterine conditions. It helps determine which setting is more effective or convenient for patients.
This study looks at two ways to remove the uterus and cervix for early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery (like laparoscopic or robotic) versus open surgery (traditional large incision). It checks whether the less invasive approach works just as well in terms of survival and keeping the cancer from coming back.
Hear when a new Early Abortion trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.