Comparing two surgeries for early pregnancy loss after IVF
Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.
This trial compares two surgical methods (suction curettage vs. hysteroscopy) for removing early pregnancy tissue in women who conceived through IVF, to see which is safer and has fewer side effects.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 5 and 10 weeks pregnant and the pregnancy has ended.
- You got pregnant through IVF (in vitro fertilization).
- You can read and write in Hebrew.
- You are not currently having heavy bleeding or signs of infection.
- You have not had 3 or more previous miscarriages.
- You have not had 3 or more previous C-sections.
- You do not have an unusual shape of the uterus or a history of certain uterine surgeries.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two surgical procedures for removing pregnancy tissue after an early miscarriage: hysteroscopic resection and manual vacuum aspiration. It helps you understand which method might work best.
This study compares two outpatient procedures—hysteroscopy and suction—to remove retained pregnancy tissue after a miscarriage in the first 3 months. The goal is to find which method works best and is safest for people who choose surgical treatment.
This study compares two ways to remove pregnancy tissue after a first-trimester miscarriage: one done in a clinic with a handheld suction device, and the other in an operating room with electric suction. The goal is to see which approach is more cost-effective and patient-friendly.
This trial studies the best way to remove leftover pregnancy tissue after a first-trimester miscarriage. It compares approaches guided by a camera procedure in the uterus to see which helps most, especially for people who want to get pregnant again soon.
This study compares two ways to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) for non-cancerous conditions: one using small cuts and a camera (laparoscopic), and the other using a larger belly cut (abdominal). It aims to see which method works better in settings with limited resources.
This trial compares two keyhole (laparoscopic) surgeries for removing the uterus in women with non-cancerous conditions like fibroids or heavy bleeding. One method blocks the blood supply to the uterus first, which may reduce bleeding during surgery.
Hear when a new Early Abortion trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.