Clin2
NCT07606846Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Uterus repair methods during cesarean delivery study

Postpartum HemorrhageUterine AtonyUterine Atony With HemorrhageCesarean Section

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two different surgical techniques for repairing the uterus after a cesarean section (C-section). Researchers want to see which method helps the uterus work better after surgery and may inform safer practices for future pregnancies.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
60 people
Ages
18 years to 55 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 55 years old
  • You are scheduled to have a planned or semi-urgent cesarean section (not an extreme emergency)
  • You have time to discuss the study and provide consent before your surgery
  • You are willing to be randomly assigned to one of two surgical repair techniques

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06285409Recruiting
Uterus contraction medicine study during planned C-sections

This study looks at how well different doses of a contraction medicine work after an initial dose in women having a planned C-section. It may help find the best way to prevent bleeding after birth.

Toronto, Ontario
NCT06695793Recruiting
Comparing stitches for uterine closure after c-section

This study compares three different ways of stitching the uterus closed after a planned c-section. The goal is to see which method helps the uterus heal best.

Cairo
NCT06620432Recruiting
Comparing incisions in first cesarean for better healing

This study compares two ways of making the cut (incision) in the uterus during a first cesarean section to see which one helps the uterus heal better. Researchers want to know if a higher or lower incision leads to fewer defects in the uterine wall afterward.

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department
NCT07323355Recruiting
Single vs double layer stitches for cesarean scar

This trial compares two ways of stitching the uterus after a C-section to see which one leads to a thicker uterine wall later. It may help choose the best technique for future pregnancies.

Ankara, Not Valid
NCT06308172Recruiting
One vs. two layer closure in C-section: a trial on scar healing

This trial compares sewing the uterus back together in one layer versus two layers during a planned C-section. The goal is to see which method leads to a smaller scar defect (niche) in the uterine wall, which could affect future health.

Milan, Mi
NCT07625852Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgical techniques for uterine scar defects

This study compares two different ways of closing a surgical defect in the uterus (called an isthmocele) that develops after a cesarean section. The trial tests whether one closure technique produces better outcomes than the other for women experiencing symptoms like abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, or difficulty getting pregnant.

Hear when a new Postpartum Hemorrhage trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.