AI vs. human grading of physiotherapy case exams
This study compares how well large language models (AI) versus human examiners grade physiotherapy clinical case exams. If you are a third-year physiotherapy student who submitted a case exam, your anonymized work might help test whether AI can grade as accurately as people.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be a third-year physiotherapy student taking the 'Specific Methods in Physiotherapy' course.
- You need to have turned in a completed written clinical-reasoning case exam for your course.
- You must give permission (informed consent) for your anonymized test to be used in this research study.
- Your exam cannot be blank, incomplete, or have answers that can't be graded.
- Your exam must be able to have all personal info removed before it is evaluated.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial studies how well a tool called the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric works when used by physical therapy students and faculty at Youngstown State University. Researchers want to see if it can help improve how we assess clinical thinking in simulation exercises.
This trial tests whether a large language model (AI) helps third-year physiotherapy students improve their clinical reasoning skills. You would use a special AI platform or take part in traditional learning activities.
This study checks if questions written by artificial intelligence (AI) are as good as those written by people for the Chinese medical licensing exam. It could help improve how future doctors are tested.
This trial tests if an AI-based educational method helps undergraduate students develop better clinical reasoning skills. It compares this approach to standard learning.
This trial tests whether an artificial intelligence (AI) program can assess how well medical trainees (like residents and fellows) communicate with patients, compared to how humans would rate them. The goal is to find better ways to teach communication skills.
This study tests whether an AI assistant can help medical students learn better clinical reasoning skills. Students will use the AI tool during their comprehensive clinical training course and complete assessments to see if it improves their learning.
Hear when a new Artifical Intelligence trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.