Clin2
NCT07743762Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to drain fluid after left pancreas surgery

Symptomatic Fluid Collection(s)

Part of Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial compares two methods for draining fluid collections that can form after left-sided pancreas surgery. One method uses a needle through the skin, and the other uses an endoscope (a flexible tube) through the stomach. The goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective for relieving symptoms like pain or infection.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
96 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have a fluid collection after left pancreas surgery that needs draining because it causes symptoms like belly pain, nausea, or signs of infection.
  • Both drainage methods (through the skin or through the stomach) are possible for you, as decided by your doctors.
  • You have not had any previous attempts to drain this fluid collection.
  • If you had a drain placed during surgery, it must have been removed at least 5 days before the fluid collection appeared.
  • You are able to give informed consent (or have a legal representative who can).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07792486Not yet recruiting
Two drainage methods for gallbladder infection when surgery is not an option

This study compares two ways to drain an infected gallbladder when surgery is too risky: one using a needle through the skin (percutaneous drainage) and another using a tube placed through the mouth and stomach with an ultrasound (EUS-guided drainage). The goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective for patients who are not good candidates for surgery.

Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118
NCT06133023Not yet recruiting
Plastic versus metal stent for draining pancreatic pseudocysts

This trial compares two types of stents (small tubes) used to drain fluid from pancreatic pseudocysts. The goal is to see which stent type works better and has fewer complications.

Aichi
NCT06141044Not yet recruiting
Drain or no drain after pancreas tail removal

This trial compares whether leaving a temporary drain after pancreas tail removal helps prevent complications or not. Half of the patients will get a drain, and half will not, to see which approach is better.

NCT07253350Recruiting
Comparing two methods for cleaning infected pancreatic fluid collections

This trial tests a new device (Endorotor) against standard methods to clean out infected fluid collections in the pancreas after severe pancreatitis. It aims to see if the new approach works better and costs less.

Clichy
NCT07446543Not yet recruiting
Drainage versus stent for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopy

This trial compares two ways to prevent pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) after removing a growth at the duodenal papilla (where the bile duct opens into the small intestine). One method uses a small tube to drain fluids, and the other places a tiny stent to keep the duct open. The goal is to find which approach causes fewer complications during recovery.

NCT05451901Recruiting
Direct surgery versus step-by-step drainage for walled pancreatic infection

This study compares two ways to treat a pancreatic infection pocket (walled-off necrosis): removing dead/infected tissue right away versus starting with drainage and escalating if needed. It may help find the safest, most effective approach for getting the infection under control.

Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo

Hear when a new Symptomatic Fluid Collection(s) trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.