Clin2
NCT07771283Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Comparing ovarian stimulation methods for IVF

Infertility (IVF Patients)Infertility Assisted Reproductive TechnologyInfertile PatientsInfertility DrugsInfertile Women Undergoing IVF or ICSIInfertilityStimulation in the OvaryInfertile Women Undergoing ART

Treatments studied

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two methods of stimulating the ovaries before IVF: one using a standard hormone (hCG) and another using a different protocol. The goal is to see if the new method works as well as the standard one, while possibly being more cost-effective.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
360 people
Ages
18 years to 40 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be a woman aged 18 to 40 years.
  • You must be undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.
  • Your body mass index (BMI) must be 35 or lower.
  • You must not have ovarian endometriomas or a history of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
  • You must not have severe hormonal disorders, cancer, or other conditions that prevent hormonal stimulation.
  • You must not have male factor infertility due to cryptozoospermia (very low sperm count).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06396390Not yet recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing Two Hormone Methods for IVF Stimulation

This study compares two ways to prepare the ovaries for egg retrieval before IVF: using a progestin hormone or a GnRH antagonist. The goal is to see which method leads to more successful embryo transfers.

Istanbul, Sisli
NCT06879002Not yet recruiting
Comparing two IVF stimulation approaches for better egg collection

This trial tests a new way to stimulate ovaries after ovulation using a single injection of Elonva, compared to a standard method starting on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. It aims to see which approach leads to more mature eggs for IVF or ICSI.

Abu Dhabi
NCT06093984Not yet recruiting
Comparing two IVF approaches for women with low egg reserve

This trial tests whether doing two shorter rounds of hormone stimulation in one menstrual cycle (dual ovarian stimulation) leads to more live births than the usual two separate stimulation cycles for women who have a low egg reserve. The goal is to find a better way to help women who have had limited success with IVF.

NCT07772375Not yet recruiting
Comparing two starting hormone doses for IVF in healthy younger women

This trial compares two starting doses of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) to see which works better. FSH helps your ovaries produce eggs, and the study aims to find the best dose for women with good fertility prospects.

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City
NCT06738602Not yet recruiting
Stimulation protocols for high-egg producers in IVF

This trial compares two types of hormone stimulation protocols for women who are expected to produce many eggs during IVF. It aims to see which method leads to better outcomes.

NCT06637189Not yet recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing two hormone methods for IVF with genetic testing

This trial is for IVF patients who need genetic testing (PGT-A) before embryo transfer. It compares two different hormone protocols (PPOS and GnRH antagonists) used to stimulate egg growth and collection in a double stimulation cycle.

Hear when a new Infertility (IVF Patients) trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.