Clin2
NCT07813780Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to repair a perforated peptic ulcer

Perforated Peptic UlcerPeptic Ulcer PerforationDuodenal Ulcer PerforationGastric Ulcer Perforation

Part of Digestive system clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to close a hole in the stomach or intestine during keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery: one uses a piece of tissue from the liver area, the other uses a piece of belly fat. The goal is to see which technique works better for healing and fewer complications.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
70 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be 18 years or older and have a hole (perforation) in your stomach or the first part of your intestine (duodenum) that the doctor finds during surgery.
  • The hole needs to be 2 cm or smaller, so it can be closed with a patch rather than removing part of your stomach.
  • You must be healthy enough for general anesthesia and for the surgeon to use gas to inflate your belly during keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery.
  • You should have started having symptoms within the last 24 hours, or if later, the doctor must decide it’s still safe to do keyhole surgery.
  • You must not have severe infection with shock, cancer in the ulcer, or be pregnant.
  • You must be able to give written permission for the surgery and follow-up visits.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05715450Not yet recruiting
Falciformopexy for perforated peptic ulcer repair

This trial tests a surgical technique called falciformopexy to close and reinforce a perforated peptic ulcer, which can help treat the hole in the stomach lining and prevent complications.

NCT06697067Recruiting
Comparing two ways to close belly incisions after emergency surgery

This study compares two different stitch techniques to close the belly wall after emergency surgery for a hole in the stomach or intestines. It aims to see which method leads to better healing and fewer wound problems.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT04591860Not yet recruiting
Comparing three repair methods for large hiatal hernias

This trial compares three ways to repair a large hiatal hernia—using an absorbable mesh (a dissolvable patch), special sutures with small pledgets (reinforcement pads), or sutures alone. The goal is to find out which method works best for preventing the hernia from coming back.

NCT07766044Recruiting
Comparing two ways to close belly surgery cuts

This study compares two methods of closing the cut made during belly surgery to see which one is less likely to cause a hernia later. It is for people having planned colorectal surgery through a midline incision.

Helsingborg, Skåne County
NCT05356156Not yet recruiting
Closing a gap during stomach removal surgery

This study compares two ways of closing a gap that forms after stomach removal surgery. The goal is to see if closing it reduces complications compared to leaving it open, which may help you recover better.

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT03932461Recruiting
Wound suction vs immediate re-operation for severe bowel infection

This trial compares two ways of treating the abdomen after emergency surgery when there is severe contamination from a bowel perforation causing widespread peritonitis. It may help find the safest approach to control infection and promote healing.

Odense, Fyn

Hear when a new Perforated Peptic Ulcer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.