Compare two endoscopy removal methods for Barrett’s lesions
Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.
This study compares two ways doctors remove abnormal tissue in the esophagus during endoscopy: EMR versus ESD. It may help improve how safely and completely these lesions are removed, while also comparing outcomes between the two methods.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be 18 or older
- You must be willing to undergo both EMR or ESD as part of the study plan
- You can understand the study and sign written consent
- You have Barrett’s disease with at least one visible lesion that looks suitable for endoscopic removal (no signs of deeper spread on endoscopy review)
- If you had earlier endoscopic removal, your target lesion must not be within 1 cm of that previous spot
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two approaches for people with Barrett’s esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: regular monitoring versus treatment done through an endoscopy. It aims to see which approach is safer and better at preventing progression to more serious changes in the esophagus.
This study is for adults who need a procedure called endoscopic submucosal dissection to remove a lesion in the esophagus. Researchers will track outcomes to better understand how this treatment works in real-world settings.
This study looks at treatment options for people with Barrett’s esophagus that has progressed to abnormal cell growth (dysplasia) or cancer. It may help doctors compare approaches that use procedures to remove and/or destroy abnormal tissue in the esophagus.
This trial is checking outcomes for adults who are scheduled to have a procedure called endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), done through an endoscope. If you’re already planned for ESD and have no reasons you can’t have endoscopy, you may be able to join.
This study compares two endoscopic treatments to remove abnormal cells in Barrett’s esophagus and lower the chance of it worsening. If you qualify, you may be assigned to one of the two procedures and followed to see how well they work and how safe they are.
This study compares two minimally invasive endoscopic techniques—ESD and EPMR—for removing small neuroendocrine tumors (slow-growing hormone-producing tumors) in the rectum. The goal is to see which approach works better and is safer for patients.
Hear when a new Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.