Clin2
NCT05882188Possibly a fitRecruiting

Test which tubal scan is more cost-effective

Infertility

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to check whether the fallopian tubes are open during a fertility work-up. It looks at which test is more cost-effective, and it may help guide which option you use.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,102 people
Ages
18 years to 42 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are being evaluated for infertility, or your periods are irregular/you do not ovulate regularly
  • Your fertility work-up includes needing a fallopian-tube “open/blocked” test
  • You can read and understand Dutch or English well enough to take part
  • You are able to sign the consent form to join the study

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07736859Enrolling by invitation
A study on foam ultrasound for fertility evaluation

This study looks at how satisfied women are with a special ultrasound test (HyFoSy) that uses foam to check the fallopian tubes and uterus as part of a fertility workup. It aims to learn if this method is comfortable and helpful for patients.

Nancy
NCT07226310Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Hysterosalpingogram experience and tube spasm study

This study looks at how women feel during an HSG (an X-ray test for blocked fallopian tubes) and whether a medication like nitroglycerin or lidocaine can help prevent pain from tubal spasms. You may be eligible if you are about to have this test.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
NCT07771283Enrolling by invitation
Comparing ovarian stimulation methods for IVF

This study compares two methods of stimulating the ovaries before IVF: one using a standard hormone (hCG) and another using a different protocol. The goal is to see if the new method works as well as the standard one, while possibly being more cost-effective.

Kampala
NCT06093984Not yet recruiting
Comparing two IVF approaches for women with low egg reserve

This trial tests whether doing two shorter rounds of hormone stimulation in one menstrual cycle (dual ovarian stimulation) leads to more live births than the usual two separate stimulation cycles for women who have a low egg reserve. The goal is to find a better way to help women who have had limited success with IVF.

NCT07340827Recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing two fertility drugs in Japanese women with hormone deficiency

This study tests if a combination of two hormone drugs (follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa) works as well as another drug (hMG) for Japanese women with low LH and FSH levels who are doing in vitro fertilization (IVF). The goal is to help them produce eggs for pregnancy.

Akita, Akita
NCT05677269Recruiting
Compare surgery for bowel endometriosis versus IVF pathway

This trial studies whether surgically removing colorectal (bowel) endometriosis works better and is more cost-effective than choosing an IVF/ICSI treatment plan. It’s for people who want to get pregnant and are deciding between surgery and fertility treatments.

Eindhoven

Hear when a new Infertility trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.