Clin2
NCT06278220Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to measure eye surface imperfections

Corneal Higher-order Aberrations

Part of Eyes & vision clinical trials.

This trial compares two different systems for measuring small imperfections (higher-order aberrations) in the clear front part of your eye (cornea). It aims to see which method is better for people with common vision problems like nearsightedness, farsightedness, or astigmatism.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
36 people
Ages
18 years to 45 years
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You have nearsightedness / farsightedness between +6 and -8 diopters and astigmatism up to -6 diopters.
  • You do not have diabetes or other long-term health conditions affecting the whole body.
  • You do not have keratoconus (cone-shaped cornea) or a lazy eye (amblyopia).
  • Your best-corrected vision (with glasses or contacts) is 20/25 or better.
  • You do not have glaucoma.
  • You have not had any previous eye surgeries or eye injuries.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06801678Recruiting
Comparing two eye measurement devices for cataract surgery

This trial tests two different devices that measure your eyes before cataract surgery to see which one helps doctors choose the best lens implant. The goal is to get your vision as close to perfect as possible after surgery.

Salt Lake City, Utah
NCT03504800Recruiting
Using OCT scans to diagnose irregular corneas

This study tests whether a special eye scan called OCT can better identify causes of irregular cornea shape. Results may help doctors sort out different cornea problems so treatment choices, like certain procedures, can be more targeted.

Portland, Oregon
NCT03299530Recruiting
Testing how corneal astigmatism measures on different settings

This study checks how accurately eye measurements describe astigmatism (a focus-bending problem) using different exam modes. It may help improve how doctors assess astigmatism after cataract surgery so treatment planning is more precise.

Wenzhou, Zhejiang
NCT05486546Recruiting
Compare two LASIK mapping methods for myopia and astigmatism

This trial compares two ways of mapping your eye to guide LASIK surgery for people with nearsightedness and mild astigmatism. It looks at how well vision (especially best-corrected vision) does after surgery one month later.

Bozeman, Montana
NCT07782619Not yet recruiting
Comparing two eye measurement devices in different eye conditions

This study compares two eye measurement devices to see if they give similar results in people with healthy eyes, keratoconus (a cone-shaped cornea), daily contact lens use, dry eye, or after laser eye surgery. Participating may help ensure these devices are accurate for different patients.

Salt Lake City, Utah
NCT07372911Recruiting
Comparing two cornea treatments for keratoconus

This trial tests two different laser-based procedures to treat keratoconus, a condition that weakens and bulges the cornea. The goal is to see which approach better strengthens the eye and improves vision.

Mexico City, Mexico City

Hear when a new Corneal Higher-order Aberrations trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.