Comparing two types of keyhole gallbladder surgery
Part of Digestive system clinical trials.
This study compares two ways of doing keyhole surgery to remove the gallbladder, using either three or four small cuts. The goal is to see if one method leads to less pain and a faster recovery.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have been diagnosed with gallstones and are scheduled for keyhole gallbladder removal.
- You are not pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Your surgery is expected to be done completely with keyhole techniques, without needing to switch to open surgery.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two different methods for removing the gallbladder during laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery. It aims to see if one method causes fewer problems or is easier for patients like you.
This study compares two ways to drain the gallbladder without removing it: using an endoscope (a thin tube) versus a non-endoscopic method. It is for people with gallbladder problems who are either too sick for surgery or want to avoid removing their gallbladder.
This trial looks at whether healing after gallbladder removal is better when the surgery is done with a few small cuts (laparoscopy) versus one larger cut (open surgery). It may help you avoid wound infections.
This trial is comparing two types of keyhole surgery for removing the gallbladder: one done with a robot and the other with standard laparoscopic tools. The goal is to find out which technique leads to a better recovery and fewer complications for people with non-cancerous gallbladder problems like gallstones or polyps.
This study tests whether removing the gallbladder through a single small cut (single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) is safe and effective for people with acute cholecystitis (sudden gallbladder inflammation). It may mean less pain and faster recovery than traditional surgery.
This study compares two types of minimally invasive surgery (using small incisions) to remove both ovaries. One method uses 4K high-definition cameras, the other uses 3D cameras. The goal is to see which approach is better for people with non-cancerous ovarian problems.
Hear when a new Cholelithiasis trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.