Clin2
NCT07071831Possibly a fitRecruiting

Retrograde access study for kidney stone removal

Renal Stones

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of getting a needle to the kidney for PCNL surgery (a procedure to remove stones). It aims to find which approach is safer and more effective for people with kidney stones between 1.5 and 3 cm.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
150 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You have a kidney stone (or stones) that add up to 1.5 to 3 cm in total size.
  • You are age 18 or older.
  • You are scheduled to have a PCNL procedure while lying on your back (supine position).
  • You are not pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • You have not had a PCNL on the same side before, and you have not had certain prior surgeries on your kidney, ureter, or bladder.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07172373Not yet recruiting
Combined scope procedure for large kidney stones

This study tests a new way to remove large, branching kidney stones (staghorn stones) using two types of scopes through the back and urinary tract. It aims to see if this method is safe and effective, possibly leading to better stone removal with less harm.

NCT07322471Not yet recruiting
Comparing two procedures for large kidney stones

This study compares two ways to remove large staghorn kidney stones: one uses a thin scope through the urinary tract, the other uses a small cut in the back to reach the kidney directly. The goal is to see which method is safer and works better for patients.

Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia
NCT07058402Recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone surgeries for medium stones

This trial compares two different surgeries for removing a single kidney stone that is 2 to 3 centimeters in size. One method uses a flexible scope with a suction tube, and the other uses a small incision in the back. The goal is to see which works better and has fewer side effects.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
NCT07627503Not yet recruiting
Comparing two positions for kidney stone surgery

This study compares two ways of positioning patients during surgery to remove large kidney stones. It aims to find which position is safer and more effective for people with stones larger than 2 cm.

Sanaa
NCT06914986Not yet recruiting
New less invasive technique for large kidney stones

This study tests a newer, less invasive way to remove large kidney stones (partial staghorn stones) using a flexible tube and a tiny needle. It aims to see if this method is safer and more effective than standard surgery, helping you recover faster.

NCT07749807Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove kidney stones through a small back incision

This study compares two methods for removing kidney stones when they are too large or complex for other treatments. Both methods use a small cut in the back to reach the kidney, and the goal is to find which approach works better with fewer complications.

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate

Hear when a new Renal Stones trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.