Clin2
NCT07199621Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Scissors vs. Scalpel for C-section Incision

Blood Loss in Uterotomy

Part of Blood & lymphatic, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to make the cut (incision) in the uterus during a planned C-section: using surgical scissors versus a scalpel. It aims to see which method may lead to better outcomes for mothers.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
140 people
Ages
18 years to 40 years
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are pregnant and between 18 and 40 years old.
  • Your baby is full-term (between 37 and 42 weeks of pregnancy).
  • You are scheduled for a planned (elective) caesarean section.
  • You do not have placenta previa or placenta accreta (conditions where the placenta covers or attaches too deeply into the uterus).
  • You are not in obstructed labor.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06695793Recruiting
Comparing stitches for uterine closure after c-section

This study compares three different ways of stitching the uterus closed after a planned c-section. The goal is to see which method helps the uterus heal best.

Cairo
NCT06620432Recruiting
Comparing incisions in first cesarean for better healing

This study compares two ways of making the cut (incision) in the uterus during a first cesarean section to see which one helps the uterus heal better. Researchers want to know if a higher or lower incision leads to fewer defects in the uterine wall afterward.

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department
NCT06483724Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to reduce bleeding during c-section for placenta accreta

This study compares two methods (a cervical tourniquet and tying off the uterine artery) to control bleeding during a c-section for women with placenta accreta. If you are having an elective c-section at 36 weeks or later for this condition, this trial may help reduce blood loss.

NCT06308172Recruiting
One vs. two layer closure in C-section: a trial on scar healing

This trial compares sewing the uterus back together in one layer versus two layers during a planned C-section. The goal is to see which method leads to a smaller scar defect (niche) in the uterine wall, which could affect future health.

Milan, Mi
NCT07466719Recruiting
Comparing two ways to give blood transfusions during c-section for heavy bleeding

This trial tests if using a manual syringe or an automatic pressure bag is better and safer for giving blood transfusions to women who have major bleeding during a cesarean section. It aims to find which method works faster and with fewer complications.

Aswān
NCT07167199Not yet recruiting
Absorbable staples vs. conventional skin closure for C-sections

This study compares two ways to close the skin after a C-section: absorbable staples (which dissolve on their own) versus regular stitches or staples. It aims to see which method works better for healing and scarring.

Falls Church, Virginia

Hear when a new Blood Loss in Uterotomy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.