Clin2
NCT07199621Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to cut the womb in planned C-sections

Blood Loss in Uterotomy

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of making the uterine incision (the cut into the womb) during a planned C-section: one using special scissors and the other using a scalpel (a surgical knife). The goal is to see which method is safer or better for you and your baby.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
140 people
Ages
18 years to 40 years
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You must be between 18 and 40 years old
  • You must be between 37 and 42 weeks pregnant
  • You must be admitted to the hospital for a planned (elective) caesarean delivery
  • You must not have placenta previa or placenta accreta
  • You must not be in obstructed labor

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06695793Recruiting
Comparing stitches for uterine closure after c-section

This study compares three different ways of stitching the uterus closed after a planned c-section. The goal is to see which method helps the uterus heal best.

Cairo
NCT06620432Recruiting
Comparing incisions in first cesarean for better healing

This study compares two ways of making the cut (incision) in the uterus during a first cesarean section to see which one helps the uterus heal better. Researchers want to know if a higher or lower incision leads to fewer defects in the uterine wall afterward.

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department
NCT06575023Not yet recruiting
Comparing two womb-saving surgeries for placenta accreta

This study compares two surgical techniques to manage placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), a condition where the placenta grows too deeply into the womb. The goal is to find a safer way to control bleeding during delivery and possibly avoid removing the womb (hysterectomy).

NCT07496814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two hysterectomy methods for non-cancer conditions

This study compares two ways to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) for non-cancerous conditions: one using small cuts and a camera (laparoscopic), and the other using a larger belly cut (abdominal). It aims to see which method works better in settings with limited resources.

NCT06308172Recruiting
One vs. two layer closure in C-section: a trial on scar healing

This trial compares sewing the uterus back together in one layer versus two layers during a planned C-section. The goal is to see which method leads to a smaller scar defect (niche) in the uterine wall, which could affect future health.

Milan, Mi
NCT06788873Recruiting
Comparing two ways to place a cervical stitch

This trial looks at two methods of placing a stitch in the cervix to help prevent early birth in women who have had preterm deliveries or late miscarriages before. It compares a stitch placed through the vagina versus one placed through the belly using a laparoscope (a small camera tool).

Bologna, Bologna

Hear when a new Blood Loss in Uterotomy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.