Clin2
NCT07496814Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two types of hysterectomy for non-cancer conditions

Benign Gynecologic Conditions

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two methods of hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) for benign (non-cancer) conditions. It aims to see if the less invasive laparoscopic approach is as effective as traditional abdominal surgery in settings with limited resources.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
32 people
Ages
35 years to 65 years
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are between 35 and 65 years old.
  • You need a hysterectomy for a non-cancerous condition like fibroids or endometriosis.
  • Your uterus is no larger than the size of a 16-week pregnancy.
  • You do not have cancer or suspicion of cancer.
  • You have not had major abdominal surgery that caused severe scarring (dense adhesions).
  • Your body mass index (BMI) is 40 or less.
  • You do not have serious heart or lung disease.
  • You are not pregnant.
  • You are willing to participate in the study.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06776718Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for non-cancer conditions

This trial compares two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina, using either special instruments (VNOTES) or the traditional approach (vaginal hysterectomy). It is for women who need this surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Istanbul
NCT07120529Recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for early cervical cancer

This study looks at two ways to remove the uterus and cervix for early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery (like laparoscopic or robotic) versus open surgery (traditional large incision). It checks whether the less invasive approach works just as well in terms of survival and keeping the cancer from coming back.

Bialystok
NCT06802198Not yet recruiting
Comparing partial vs full hysterectomy outcomes

This trial compares two types of hysterectomy (removing the uterus) to see which has better long-term results. It may help if you are considering surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Rome, Lazio
NCT06663553Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of less invasive hysterectomy for enlarged uterus

This study compares two newer, less invasive surgical methods for removing an enlarged uterus (total hysterectomy). The goal is to see which approach works better for women with a uterus weighing at least 280 grams (about the size of a 3-month pregnancy). Both techniques are performed through small incisions, avoiding open surgery.

Chengdu, Sichuan
NCT04886791Recruiting
Compare two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina

This study compares a newer “vaginal NOTES” approach with the standard way of removing the uterus through the vagina. It may help find which method is safer or easier for people who need a hysterectomy for non-cancer (benign) reasons.

Eindhoven, North Brabant
NCT07226375Recruiting
Trial comparing two hysterectomy methods for large uteri

This study tests a new device that cuts and removes tissue through a tiny camera during laparoscopic hysterectomy. It may help women with very large uteri have a less invasive surgery compared to the standard cold scalpel method.

Izmir

Hear when a new Benign Gynecologic Conditions trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.