Clin2
NCT07241143Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Drain securement methods in rectal surgery

Rectal Diseases, Sigmoid Colon DiseaseRectal Cancer, Sigmoid Colon Cancer

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of securing the drain after rectal cancer surgery to see which causes fewer complications. It may be a good fit if you are having a low rectal resection with a drain placed during surgery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
596 people
Ages
20 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are scheduled for a rectal resection (anterior or low anterior resection) with a drain placed during surgery.
  • The planned connection (anastomosis) is expected to be 10 cm or less from the anal opening.
  • You are not having any additional colon removal beyond the rectal surgery.
  • You are not scheduled for a permanent stoma (colostomy).
  • You have not had prior pelvic surgery (like hysterectomy or prostatectomy) that could cause scarring.
  • You are not in very poor health (ASA 4) or expected to need ICU care after surgery.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06690112Recruiting
Early drain removal after stomach cancer surgery

This pilot study tests whether it is safe to remove the surgical drain early in patients with a specific amount of output after stomach cancer surgery. It may help reduce discomfort and hospital stay for patients whose drain output is moderate.

Seoul
NCT07036588Recruiting
Drain tube study to prevent leaks after rectal cancer surgery

This study tests whether using a special drain tube during rectal cancer surgery helps prevent leakage at the connection point where the intestine is rejoined. If you are planning to have surgery to remove rectal cancer, this might lower your risk of complications.

Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality
NCT07346534Enrolling by invitation
Comparing reinforced vs. standard bowel connection in rectal cancer surgery

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the bowel after removing rectal cancer using keyhole surgery. It aims to see if a reinforced connection (with extra support) helps prevent leaks better than the standard method.

Shanghai
NCT06314646Recruiting
Comparing two ways to reconnect the intestine after rectal cancer surgery

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the intestine after rectal cancer surgery. It looks at a newer method called TTSS against the standard double-stapled technique.

Rozzano, MI
NCT07209787Recruiting· Phase 4
Reinforced vs. standard connection for rectal cancer surgery

This trial tests whether a special reinforcement patch (made from pig tissue) can reduce the risk of leaks when the rectum is reconnected after rectal cancer surgery. It compares the reinforced connection to the standard method.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07004634Recruiting
Comparing Drain Types After Minimally Invasive Esophageal Cancer Surgery

This study compares two different ways of placing drains after minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. It aims to find which method helps you recover better and with fewer complications.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality

Hear when a new Rectal Diseases, Sigmoid Colon Disease trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.