Clin2
NCT07378982Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two types of overlays for damaged back teeth

Endodontically Treated MolarDental Restoration, Permanent

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to make a strong cap (overlay) for back teeth that had root canals and are badly damaged. It tests a 3D-printed ceramic filling against one made by a computer and milling machine, and follows up for 18 months to see which works better.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
32 people
Ages
18 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 60 years old
  • You have at least one back tooth that has had root canal treatment and is damaged but not beyond repair
  • You do not grind or clench your teeth
  • You are not a heavy smoker
  • You are not pregnant
  • You have good oral hygiene and at least 20 teeth still meeting

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07614451Not yet recruiting
Comparing overlay fillings for treated molars

This study compares two ways of preparing a back tooth (molar) for an overlay filling after a root canal. It aims to find which method works best for restoring strength and function to the tooth. If you need an overlay on a treated molar, this trial could help improve your dental care.

NCT07031856Recruiting
3D printed vs. CAD-CAM dental restorations comparison

This trial compares two modern ways to make partial dental restorations (like crowns or bridges): one using a 3D printer and the other using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system. It aims to see which method works better for people who need a couple of teeth fixed.

Adana, Sarıçam
NCT07708077Not yet recruiting
3D-printed versus milled crowns for root-canaled back teeth

This study compares two ways of making a special type of crown (called an endocrown) for back teeth that have had root canals. One method uses 3D printing, the other uses milling from a solid block. The goal is to see which crown fits better and lasts longer over 18 months.

Giza
NCT07005167Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ceramic crowns for root-canaled molars

This study compares two types of tooth-colored ceramic crowns for back teeth that have had root canal treatment. The goal is to see which material works better and lasts longer, helping you keep your natural tooth strong.

Cairo
NCT07853118Enrolling by invitation
3D-printed vs ceramic partial crowns for back teeth

This trial compares two types of partial crowns (overlays) for back teeth: one made with a 3D printer and one milled from a strong ceramic material. If you need an overlay on a molar, this study may help determine which method gives a better fit and durability.

Tanta, Tanta
NCT07836920Recruiting
Comparing two tooth-restoration approaches after root canal treatment

This study compares two ways to restore teeth that have had root canals, focusing on back teeth. It aims to see which approach is more conservative and effective, which may help preserve more of your natural tooth and improve long-term outcomes.

Cairo, Manial

Hear when a new Endodontically Treated Molar trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.