Clin2
NCT07409896Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two numbing shots for painful lower first molars

Anesthetic Efficacy

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two numbing methods for severe tooth pain (pulpitis) in a lower first molar. If you have a tooth that needs a root canal and the pain lingers after cold, this trial may help determine which anesthetic works better for you.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
330 people
Ages
18 years to 55 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 55 years old.
  • You need a root canal on a lower first molar and the tooth is still alive (not dead or abscessed).
  • You have severe tooth pain that lingers for more than 10 seconds after something cold touches it.
  • You have not taken any painkillers for at least 6 hours before the appointment.
  • You are not allergic to lidocaine, articaine, or epinephrine (common dental numbing medicines).
  • You do not have serious medical conditions, are not pregnant or breastfeeding, and are not on blood thinners or high blood pressure medication.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06806202Recruiting· Phase 2
Warm vs. standard numbing medicine for tooth injections

This trial tests if warming the numbing medicine before injecting it into the jaw makes the numbing work better for people with a painful tooth infection. If you have a bad toothache in a lower molar and need a dental procedure, this study might help make the numbing more effective.

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province
NCT07296926Recruiting
Numbing injection comparison for wisdom tooth removal

This study compares two numbing methods for removing a lower wisdom tooth. One is an injection near the tooth and the other is a nerve block. It aims to see which works better and may be more comfortable.

Islamabad
NCT07130760Recruiting
Testing two numbing methods for tooth pain in a back molar

This trial compares two ways to numb a painful lower back molar. If you have a tooth infection that needs a root canal, you may receive one of two injection techniques to see which works better.

Ferrol, A coruña
NCT06500871Not yet recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two numbing medicines for painful back tooth

This trial tests if a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (diclofenac potassium) injected into the ligament around a painful lower molar works better than a standard local anesthetic (articaine) for numbing. It is for people with a specific type of severe, ongoing tooth pain (symptomatic irreversible pulpitis).

NCT07231614Not yet recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing lidocaine and articaine for tooth extractions

This trial compares two common numbing medicines, lidocaine and articaine, for simple tooth removals. It aims to see which works better for pain control and is a good choice for patients needing this dental procedure.

Valdivia, Los Ríos Region
NCT07714915Not yet recruiting
Comparing numbing methods for children's lower baby tooth root canals

This study compares different numbing techniques for a root canal on lower baby molars in children aged 6 to 8. It aims to find which method works best and helps kids feel more comfortable during the procedure.

Merkez, Rize Province

Hear when a new Anesthetic Efficacy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.