Clin2
NCT07596498Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two surgical approaches for severe vaginal prolapse

Apical Prolapse

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical techniques to repair severe dropping of the uterus or vaginal vault (the top of the vagina). Both procedures use small cameras and instruments, and the trial aims to understand which approach works better and how quickly surgeons learn each technique.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
40 years to 75 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have been diagnosed with severe uterine prolapse (stage III or higher) or severe vault vaginal prolapse (stage III or higher)
  • You are not pregnant and not currently breastfeeding
  • You do not have serious heart, liver, kidney, blood diseases, or other severe conditions that would make surgery unsafe
  • Your prolapse is not limited to just the front or back wall of the vagina alone
  • You are not planning to become pregnant in the future

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04478747Recruiting
Mesh versus suspension surgery for vaginal prolapse

This trial compares two surgical options to treat a type of vaginal prolapse where the top of the vagina (apical area) has dropped. It may help find which approach works better and has fewer long-term problems for people who’ve had prior prolapse surgery and a hysterectomy.

Helsinki
NCT06902909Enrolling by invitation
Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

This study tests two types of laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse, a condition where pelvic organs drop into the vaginal area. One method uses mesh to support the vaginal top, and the other repairs the front or back vaginal wall. It aims to find which approach works best.

Seinäjoki
NCT05586984Recruiting
Compare two uterus-support surgeries for uterine prolapse

This trial compares two surgical ways to support the uterus without removing it: a vaginal approach versus a laparoscopic (camera) approach. It may help you choose the method that best improves uterine prolapse symptoms and function.

Tainan
NCT06815731Recruiting
Laparoscopic surgery for prolapse repair: a multicenter study

This study tests how well laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery fixes moderate to severe prolapse in the front or middle of the vagina. It is for women who have not had prior prolapse surgery through the belly or with vaginal mesh.

Murcia
NCT07245823Recruiting
A study comparing two surgical repairs for vaginal laxity

This trial tests two surgical methods to tighten the vaginal opening and improve comfort during sex. It is for women who have stopped having sex because the vagina feels too loose.

Dijon
NCT07082023Recruiting
Comparing two surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse

This trial compares two minimally-invasive surgical techniques to fix pelvic organ prolapse. It aims to see which method works better and has fewer side effects.

Istanbul

Hear when a new Apical Prolapse trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.