Clin2
NCT07819279Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Brain and vital sign scores for predicting injury survival

Trauma InjuryModified Trauma Scoring SystemsFOUR Score

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study looks at whether a simple scoring tool can predict the chance of survival or death in people who have experienced a traumatic injury. It aims to help doctors make quicker and better decisions in emergency situations.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
2,000 people
Ages
16 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You were treated in a hospital emergency or intensive care setting for a traumatic injury.
  • Your medical team collected the necessary vital signs and tests (like breathing, heart rate, and brain function checks) that are used to calculate the fREMS score.
  • Your medical outcome (whether you survived or not) is documented in your medical records.
  • You were not initially treated at another hospital and then moved to a different one for further care.
  • Your initial medical assessment was completed while you were alive and before any serious deterioration.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07816016Not yet recruiting
Using a new score to predict survival after brain injury

This study looks at whether a special score, called the fREMS, can help predict if someone with a traumatic brain injury is likely to die. Doctors will use your medical records to see if this score works well.

Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate
NCT06709547Recruiting
Predicting survival after injury using trauma scores

Researchers want to see if certain injury scores can predict how well trauma patients will do. You may be asked to join this study if you come to the emergency room with an injury and agree to have your scores calculated.

Baghdad
NCT07186777Recruiting
Comparing trauma scores in emergency care

This study compares three different scoring systems (EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP) used to quickly assess how severe a trauma injury is. The goal is to see which score works best at predicting outcomes, which could help doctors make faster decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06732752Not yet recruiting
New trauma score to predict survival in emergency patients

This study is testing a new way to predict how likely a trauma patient is to survive, using a new scoring system called the New Trauma Score. If you've been injured and are in the emergency department, this score may help doctors make better treatment decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06711276Recruiting
Testing a new injury scoring system for blunt trauma patients

This study is testing how well a new scoring system (called NISS) measures the severity of injuries after a blunt trauma, like a car crash or fall. By using this score soon after you arrive, doctors hope to better predict your recovery and care needs.

Baghdad
NCT06744985Recruiting
Comparing two scoring tools for trauma outcomes

This trial compares two scoring systems (RTS and MGAP) to see which one better predicts recovery, need for intensive care, or complications in people who arrive at the hospital within 6 hours of a traumatic injury.

Baghdad

Hear when a new Trauma Injury trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.