Clin2
NCT06744985Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two scoring tools for trauma outcomes

Multiple Trauma/Injuries

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This trial compares two scoring systems (RTS and MGAP) to see which one better predicts recovery, need for intensive care, or complications in people who arrive at the hospital within 6 hours of a traumatic injury.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
200 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You or your child arrived at the trauma center within 6 hours after a serious injury.
  • Medical records have all the information needed to calculate two specific trauma scores (RTS and MGAP).
  • You (or a legal representative) agree to take part in the study.
  • Your health after injury can be followed (like whether you survive, need ICU care, or have complications).
  • You are not pregnant (because trauma in pregnancy is different).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06732791Recruiting
Comparing two trauma scores for multiple injury patients

This study compares two simple scoring tools (MGAP and GAP) to see which better predicts outcomes in people with injuries to more than one body area. If you or a loved one has multiple traumatic injuries and arrives at the ER within 6 hours, this trial may help improve how doctors assess care.

Baghdad
NCT07186777Recruiting
Comparing trauma scores in emergency care

This study compares three different scoring systems (EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP) used to quickly assess how severe a trauma injury is. The goal is to see which score works best at predicting outcomes, which could help doctors make faster decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06709547Recruiting
Predicting survival after injury using trauma scores

Researchers want to see if certain injury scores can predict how well trauma patients will do. You may be asked to join this study if you come to the emergency room with an injury and agree to have your scores calculated.

Baghdad
NCT06707441Recruiting
Comparing two scores to predict chest injury outcomes

This study tests two different scoring systems (TTSS and TISS) to see which better predicts recovery in people with chest injuries like broken ribs, lung bruises, or collapsed lungs. Doctors use these scores soon after you arrive to guide treatment and predict how you'll do.

Baghdad
NCT06732752Not yet recruiting
New trauma score to predict survival in emergency patients

This study is testing a new way to predict how likely a trauma patient is to survive, using a new scoring system called the New Trauma Score. If you've been injured and are in the emergency department, this score may help doctors make better treatment decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06711276Recruiting
Testing a new injury scoring system for blunt trauma patients

This study is testing how well a new scoring system (called NISS) measures the severity of injuries after a blunt trauma, like a car crash or fall. By using this score soon after you arrive, doctors hope to better predict your recovery and care needs.

Baghdad

Hear when a new Multiple Trauma/Injuries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.