Specialist review of harm ratings for clinical responses
This study asks experienced specialist doctors to rate the severity of possible side effects (harms) in patient cases. Your ratings will help improve how clinical trial results are evaluated, and you can do it remotely from your own office.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be a fully licensed doctor in good standing.
- You should be a practicing specialist (attending or consultant level) in one of these areas: allergy and immunology, cardiology, dermatology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, hematology, infectious disease, nephrology, neurology, or pulmonology.
- You must practice in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, or Australia.
- You need a computer, stable internet, and the ability to read and respond in English.
- You must be willing to complete at least one remote rating session that lasts about three hours.
- You cannot have been involved with the specific cases or rating materials beforehand, and for validation-stage tasks, you must not have helped revise the rating system.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial uses computers and multiple experts to study adverse drug reactions. They want to compare how well machines and humans can predict a dangerous reaction. If you have had a confirmed bad reaction to a medicine, your case may help improve future safety.
This study looks at whether a small change in how doctors use electronic health records can improve how compassionate and professional they seem during your clinic visit. If you join, you would fill out a short survey after your appointment.
This study tests a new investigational drug, called HRS-8797, in healthy people to see how safe it is and how the body processes it. It's an early-phase trial, so you may not directly benefit, but your participation can help find new treatments for future patients.
This study looks at how remote medical appointments affect doctors' creativity and how open patients feel about sharing information. It may help improve telehealth experiences for both doctors and patients.
This study tests a new medicine in healthy people to see if it is safe and how the body handles it. Participating could help understand side effects before testing in patients.
This study tests a new assessment system (a set of questions/tools) to better measure how much distress cancer patients feel from symptoms. It may help cancer teams better understand your symptom burden and improve support.
Hear when a new Patient Safety trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.