Comparing endoscopic versus surgical removal for early rectal cancer
Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.
This study compares two ways to remove early-stage rectal cancer: using a scope (endoscopic) versus a small surgical procedure (TAMIS). The goal is to see which method is better for removing the cancer completely with fewer side effects.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be 18 years or older.
- You have an early-stage rectal cancer that is thought to be limited to the inner layers of the bowel wall.
- The tumor should be less than 6 cm in size and involve less than half of the bowel circumference.
- You have not had any prior treatment for this tumor, and you have not had radiation to the pelvis.
- You are able to have an MRI scan and are generally healthy enough for anesthesia if needed.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two approaches for a small, early-stage rectal cancer (T1N0). Some people get chemoradiotherapy before the tumor is removed, while others go straight to surgery. The goal is to see if adding chemoradiotherapy lowers the chance of the cancer coming back.
This trial compares two different surgery approaches for early-stage rectal cancer (T2N0M0) that is close to the anus. It tests whether a less invasive local removal followed by radiation works as well as more extensive surgery (total mesorectal excision).
This trial compares a new surgery method that uses multiple technologies to remove rectal cancer more precisely versus the standard surgery. It is for people with middle or lower rectal cancer that hasn't spread, and it may help improve outcomes after surgery.
This study compares two minimally invasive endoscopic techniques—ESD and EPMR—for removing small neuroendocrine tumors (slow-growing hormone-producing tumors) in the rectum. The goal is to see which approach works better and is safer for patients.
This study compares two ways of removing very small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (less than 1 cm): a modified technique using a special snare (mDS-EMR) versus a more involved removal called ESD. Both are done through a scope (endoscopy) without major surgery.
This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove large, non-cancerous or early-stage growths in the rectum. The goal is to see if one method is safer or more effective, which may help you avoid more invasive surgery.
Hear when a new Rectal Cancer Stage I trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.