Clin2
NCT04168099Possibly a fitRecruiting

Oral gemifloxacin versus IV cefotaxime for peritonitis

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Part of Digestive system, Infections clinical trials.

This trial compares two antibiotic treatments for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis—one taken by mouth (gemifloxacin) versus one given through a vein (cefotaxime). It may help find the best way to treat this infection and improve recovery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
60 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (an infection of the belly fluid that happens on its own).
  • Your peritonitis is not from a known cause like an injury or surgery (it must be primary/spontaneous).
  • Your doctor must confirm the type of peritonitis before you can join.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04161768Recruiting· Phase 3
Antibiotic pill study to prevent repeat belly infection in liver disease

This study tests whether taking norfloxacin plus itopride helps prevent another episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (a serious belly infection) in people with cirrhosis and fluid buildup in the abdomen. It compares that combo to norfloxacin alone to see which approach better lowers repeat infections.

Tanta
NCT06715306Recruiting
IV vs. Oral Antibiotics for Common Infections

This trial compares starting antibiotics through a vein (IV) to taking them by mouth for common infections like pneumonia, urinary tract infections, or skin infections (cellulitis). The goal is to see if oral antibiotics work just as well without the need for an IV line.

Aabenraa, Southern Denmark
NCT06847126Recruiting· Phase 3
Oral vs IV antibiotics for liver abscess treatment

This trial compares two antibiotic treatments for liver abscess: one given through an IV (into a vein) and one taken as pills by mouth. The goal is to see if the oral treatment works just as well, which could make treatment easier and more convenient for patients.

Chandigarh
NCT06342115Recruiting· Phase 4
Ceftolozane/tazobactam vs meropenem for febrile neutropenia with ESBL risk

This trial tests whether a newer antibiotic (ceftolozane/tazobactam) works as well as the standard drug (meropenem) for treating fever and low white blood cell counts in people who carry or are at risk for a certain type of resistant bacteria (ESBL). If you are colonized with ESBL or have recently used certain antibiotics, you may be eligible.

São Paulo
NCT07318584Not yet recruiting· Phase 2
Cefotetan for E. coli bloodstream infections

This trial tests whether the antibiotic cefotetan works as well as or better than standard treatments for E. coli bloodstream infections. You may be eligible if you have a confirmed E. coli infection in your blood that started in your urinary or genital area, and you have just started antibiotics in the hospital.

Portland, Oregon
NCT06422533Recruiting
Comparing Two Antibiotics for Blood Infection in Cancer Patients

This trial compares two antibiotics (ceftolozane/tazobactam vs. piperacillin/tazobactam) for treating a bloodstream infection in people with blood cancer who have a very low white blood cell count and a fever. The goal is to see which antibiotic works better.

Mexico City, Tlalpan

Hear when a new Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.