Clin2
NCT04886791Possibly a fitRecruiting

Compare two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina

HysterectomyNatural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic SurgeryVaginal Hysterectomy

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares a newer “vaginal NOTES” approach with the standard way of removing the uterus through the vagina. It may help find which method is safer or easier for people who need a hysterectomy for non-cancer (benign) reasons.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
124 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older and can give informed consent
  • You speak and read Dutch well enough to take part in the study
  • Your hysterectomy is needed for a non-cancer (benign) reason
  • Your surgeon says a vaginal hysterectomy (removing the uterus through the vagina) is possible for you
  • You have had no more than 1 prior C-section
  • You are not currently pregnant and are not a virgin

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06776718Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for non-cancer conditions

This trial compares two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina, using either special instruments (VNOTES) or the traditional approach (vaginal hysterectomy). It is for women who need this surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Istanbul
NCT07413861Not yet recruiting
Vaginal hysterectomy using a camera and light source

This trial is testing a newer, less invasive way to perform a hysterectomy called vNOTES. It uses a small camera inserted through the vagina to help surgeons remove the uterus, and may offer faster recovery for women with non-cancerous conditions.

Houston, Texas
NCT07120529Recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for early cervical cancer

This study looks at two ways to remove the uterus and cervix for early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery (like laparoscopic or robotic) versus open surgery (traditional large incision). It checks whether the less invasive approach works just as well in terms of survival and keeping the cancer from coming back.

Bialystok
NCT05884658Recruiting
Natural-orifice vaginal hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy

This trial compares two surgical approaches to remove a large, non-cancerous uterus (hysterectomy): a vaginal “through natural opening” endoscopic method versus the usual laparoscopic approach. It aims to see how these options compare for safety and recovery when the uterus is too large for simpler surgery.

Bron
NCT06658145Recruiting
New tool for vaginal hysterectomy for fibroids

This trial tests a new tool that helps doctors see better during vaginal hysterectomy (removing the uterus through the vagina). It is for women with uterine fibroids who need this surgery, and aims to see if it is safe and works well.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT06663553Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of less invasive hysterectomy for enlarged uterus

This study compares two newer, less invasive surgical methods for removing an enlarged uterus (total hysterectomy). The goal is to see which approach works better for women with a uterus weighing at least 280 grams (about the size of a 3-month pregnancy). Both techniques are performed through small incisions, avoiding open surgery.

Chengdu, Sichuan

Hear when a new Hysterectomy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.