Clin2
NCT05884658Possibly a fitRecruiting

Natural-orifice vaginal hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy

Hysterectomy, Vaginal

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This trial compares two surgical approaches to remove a large, non-cancerous uterus (hysterectomy): a vaginal “through natural opening” endoscopic method versus the usual laparoscopic approach. It aims to see how these options compare for safety and recovery when the uterus is too large for simpler surgery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
200 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are having a hysterectomy for a non-cancer (benign) reason
  • Your uterus is estimated to be large and needs hysterectomy
  • You are 18 years or older
  • You can sign consent and agree to participate
  • You are covered by a social security system
  • You are not in another interventional clinical trial

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06776718Not yet recruiting
Vaginal hysterectomy removal of womb for non-cancerous conditions

This study compares two ways of doing a hysterectomy (removing the womb) through the vagina — one using a special scope and the standard approach. It aims to see which is better for women having this surgery for non-cancerous reasons.

Istanbul
NCT04886791Recruiting
Compare two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina

This study compares a newer “vaginal NOTES” approach with the standard way of removing the uterus through the vagina. It may help find which method is safer or easier for people who need a hysterectomy for non-cancer (benign) reasons.

Eindhoven, North Brabant
NCT07846670Recruiting
Two vaginal approaches to hysterectomy for non-cancerous conditions

This study compares two ways to remove the uterus without a big belly cut: standard vaginal surgery versus a newer keyhole method (vNOTES). Both aim to help women with non-cancerous uterine conditions recover faster and avoid a large incision.

Sanliurfa, Şanlıurfa
NCT07413861Recruiting
Vaginal hysterectomy using a camera and light source

This trial is testing a newer, less invasive way to perform a hysterectomy called vNOTES. It uses a small camera inserted through the vagina to help surgeons remove the uterus, and may offer faster recovery for women with non-cancerous conditions.

Houston, Texas
NCT07496814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two hysterectomy methods for non-cancer conditions

This study compares two ways to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) for non-cancerous conditions: one using small cuts and a camera (laparoscopic), and the other using a larger belly cut (abdominal). It aims to see which method works better in settings with limited resources.

NCT06867614Recruiting
Belly-scope vs. vaginal closure after uterus removal

This study compares two ways to close the top of the vagina after a laparoscopic hysterectomy (keyhole removal of the uterus) – one done through small belly incisions and one through the vagina itself. It looks at which method works better for healing and recovery.

Cairo

Hear when a new Hysterectomy, Vaginal trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.