High-flow oxygen with a face interface versus nasal mask
Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.
This trial compares two ways of giving oxygen to people with serious breathing problems after chest trauma. It looks to see whether a high-flow system works better when delivered through a face interface rather than a facial mask, after standard nasal oxygen fails within 72 hours.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You had a chest injury within the last 72 hours
- Standard nasal oxygen is not enough (needs at least 10 liters per minute)
- You have severe low oxygen and are struggling to breathe (fast breathing and difficulty breathing)
- You have a carbon dioxide level that is 45 or higher (unless you were assessed after breathing tube removal after emergency surgery)
- You can follow the study consent process and clearly agree to participate
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two ways to give oxygen to burn patients who are sedated. It tests whether high-flow nasal oxygen or a standard nasal cannula works better.
This trial compares three ways of giving extra oxygen to people with low blood oxygen levels: a face mask with continuous pressure, a noninvasive ventilator, or high-flow oxygen through the nose. The goal is to see which method helps people avoid needing a breathing tube.
This trial compares two ways of giving oxygen during a heart surgery that uses small chest cuts. One method is a face mask, the other is a high-flow nasal tube. The study will see which keeps your oxygen levels better while you are awake but relaxed.
This study tests two common ways to help people who are having trouble breathing in the emergency room: a face mask that pushes air into the lungs (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation) or high-flow oxygen through small tubes in the nose (high-flow nasal oxygen). The goal is to find which method works better to avoid needing a breathing tube.
This trial compares two breathing support methods for people hospitalized with COPD and mild-to-moderate carbon dioxide retention. It aims to see if high-flow nasal oxygen is as effective as the standard mask-based ventilation.
This study compares two breathing treatments for people in the intensive care unit who have too much carbon dioxide in their blood. It aims to see if one treatment works better than the other.
Hear when a new Chest Trauma trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.