Compare two catheter approaches to treat ventricular tachycardia
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This study compares an “outer heart” catheter approach (epicardial) versus an “inner heart” approach (endocardial-only) to treat a dangerous heart rhythm called ventricular tachycardia. It aims to see which approach works better and is safest for people with ischemic heart disease who are having their first ablation.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- Be 18 years or older
- Have had your first radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardia caused by ischemic heart disease
- Have an ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) with remote monitoring
- If you can become pregnant, use effective birth control until you leave the hospital
- You can give written, informed consent
- You have health insurance or are cared for by the study hospital system
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial is testing a new approach to treating a fast, dangerous heart rhythm (ventricular tachycardia) that comes from scar tissue in people with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The goal is to use a special mapping technique to guide the ablation (a procedure that destroys the tiny area causing the problem) to stop the arrhythmia.
This study checks whether repeating detailed “electrical mapping” inside the heart can better assess how well catheter ablation is working for an abnormal heart rhythm called ventricular tachycardia. It may help doctors fine-tune treatment plans after your procedure, based on how your heart’s signals change over time.
This study compares two treatments for a fast heartbeat called ventricular tachycardia in people with prior heart attacks and relatively preserved heart function: one uses heat energy (ablation) to fix the electrical problem, and the other places an implantable defibrillator that shocks the heart to restore normal rhythm. The goal is to find which approach works better for people whose symptoms are well-tolerated.
This trial tests two ways to do a heart procedure (ablation) in people who have had a heart attack and now have dangerous fast heart rhythms. It compares the usual method (inside the heart only) with a method that also works on the outer surface of the heart. The goal is to see which works better to stop these rhythms.
This study compares two catheter-based procedures to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT), a fast, dangerous heart rhythm. It looks to see which approach works better at reducing repeat VT events in people with weakened heart pumping.
This trial tests two different ways of mapping the heart to guide treatment for a dangerous fast heart rhythm. The goal is to see which mapping method works better for people with an ICD who need a procedure called ablation to stop the rhythm.
Hear when a new Ischemic Cardiomyopathy trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.