Clin2
NCT06630819Likely a fitRecruiting

Comparing different volumes of numbing medicine for tooth removal

Buccal InfiltrationArticaineAnesthesia

Part of Mouth & dental, Pain clinical trials.

This study tests whether using a smaller amount of a numbing medicine (articaine) works as well as the usual amount for numbing the area before removing a lower back tooth. It aims to make the procedure more comfortable and efficient.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
114 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years old or older.
  • You are generally healthy or have a mild medical condition that doesn't limit your daily activities (like well-controlled high blood pressure or diabetes).
  • You need to have a lower back tooth (molar or premolar) removed. This could be a tooth that is badly decayed, slightly loose, or a root stump that needs to be taken out for a health reason.
  • You are not allergic to any of the numbing medicines used in the procedure.
  • You do not have an active infection at the tooth site, and you are not pregnant.
  • You are not taking any pain medications that could affect how we measure your pain.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07748390Not yet recruiting
Pain relief methods for children's tooth nerve treatment

This study compares two ways of numbing a tooth during a deep cavity treatment in children, to see which one causes less pain and anxiety. It involves a standard dental numbing injection and another technique, and may help make dental visits more comfortable for kids.

NCT07231614Not yet recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing lidocaine and articaine for tooth extractions

This trial compares two common numbing medicines, lidocaine and articaine, for simple tooth removals. It aims to see which works better for pain control and is a good choice for patients needing this dental procedure.

Valdivia, Los Ríos Region
NCT06927726Enrolling by invitation
Numbing medicine study for people with high blood pressure needing a tooth pulled

This study tests two different numbing medicines in people with high blood pressure who need a single upper tooth pulled. The goal is to see which one works better and keeps heart activity stable during the procedure.

Tanta, Tanta
NCT07409896Recruiting
Comparing two numbing shots for painful lower first molars

This study compares two numbing methods for severe tooth pain (pulpitis) in a lower first molar. If you have a tooth that needs a root canal and the pain lingers after cold, this trial may help determine which anesthetic works better for you.

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province
NCT07330518Recruiting
Comparing two numbing techniques for lower tooth removal

This study compares two ways to numb the lower jaw for removing a back tooth: one blocks a small nerve near the cheek, the other blocks the main nerve trunk. The goal is to see which method works better and causes less discomfort.

Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
NCT06538233Recruiting· Phase 2
Pain after buffered vs. non-buffered numbing medicine

This trial compares two versions of a numbing medicine (articaine) to see which causes less pain during dental work on upper front teeth.

Cleveland, Ohio

Hear when a new Buccal Infiltration trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.