Comparing open vs. robotic surgery for pelvic masses up to 8cm
Part of Cancer, Hormones & metabolism, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.
This study compares two types of minimally invasive surgery—traditional laparoscopic (keyhole) versus robotic-assisted—for removing complex ovarian cysts or masses up to 8cm that haven't spread. The goal is to see which approach might offer better recovery and outcomes for women with these growths.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have a complex pelvic growth (mass) sized 8 centimeters or less, seen on CT or MRI.
- The scan confirms the mass has not spread outside the pelvic area (stage 1 or less).
- You are between 18 and 100 years old and can understand and consent to the study.
- You are healthy enough for laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery, with no serious heart or other problems that would make it unsafe.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial tests whether doing surgery with small incisions (minimally invasive) instead of a large cut is safe and effective for advanced ovarian cancer after chemo. It may mean a faster recovery while still removing the cancer.
This study compares two minimally invasive surgery methods for removing ovarian cysts or ovaries: one through a small incision in the belly button and one through the vagina. The goal is to see which approach leads to better recovery and less pain.
This study compares imaging scans with surgery to see which better predicts if all visible ovarian cancer can be removed. It aims to improve surgical planning for women with primary ovarian cancer.
This trial checks whether having surgery to remove as much tumor as possible, followed by ongoing targeted treatment, helps people with advanced ovarian (and related) cancers live longer and/or control cancer better. It specifically uses tumor-testing results to match patients and then continues treatment after surgery.
This trial compares robotic surgery to open (traditional) surgery for women with early-stage cervix cancer. The goal is to see which approach is safer and works better for cancer control and recovery.
This trial compares two types of minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopy) for removing the uterus in people with early-stage, low- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. The goal is to see which approach offers the best value and outcomes.
Hear when a new Ovarian cancer trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.