Clin2
NCT06732791Likely a fitRecruiting

Comparing two trauma scores for multiple injury patients

Trauma

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares two simple scoring tools (MGAP and GAP) to see which better predicts outcomes in people with injuries to more than one body area. If you or a loved one has multiple traumatic injuries and arrives at the ER within 6 hours, this trial may help improve how doctors assess care.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
522 people
Ages
16 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are 16 years old or older.
  • You have injuries involving two or more body regions (like head and chest, or arm and leg).
  • You arrive at the emergency room within 6 hours of the accident.
  • You or a family member can agree to take part in the study.
  • You are not pregnant.
  • Your main injury is not from burns.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06711276Recruiting
Testing a new injury scoring system for blunt trauma patients

This study is testing how well a new scoring system (called NISS) measures the severity of injuries after a blunt trauma, like a car crash or fall. By using this score soon after you arrive, doctors hope to better predict your recovery and care needs.

Baghdad
NCT06732752Not yet recruiting
New trauma score to predict survival in emergency patients

This study is testing a new way to predict how likely a trauma patient is to survive, using a new scoring system called the New Trauma Score. If you've been injured and are in the emergency department, this score may help doctors make better treatment decisions.

Baghdad
NCT05799170Not yet recruiting
Regional trauma care for severe injuries

This trial tests whether a coordinated regional trauma care system helps adults with severe injuries recover better. It compares the current standard of care to a more organized approach to emergency treatment.

NCT07186777Recruiting
Comparing trauma scores in emergency care

This study compares three different scoring systems (EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP) used to quickly assess how severe a trauma injury is. The goal is to see which score works best at predicting outcomes, which could help doctors make faster decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06744985Recruiting
Comparing two scoring tools for trauma outcomes

This trial compares two scoring systems (RTS and MGAP) to see which one better predicts recovery, need for intensive care, or complications in people who arrive at the hospital within 6 hours of a traumatic injury.

Baghdad
NCT06709547Recruiting
Predicting survival after injury using trauma scores

Researchers want to see if certain injury scores can predict how well trauma patients will do. You may be asked to join this study if you come to the emergency room with an injury and agree to have your scores calculated.

Baghdad

Hear when a new Trauma trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.