Comparing video vs direct laryngoscopy for newborn intubation

This study compares two ways of placing a thin tube into a newborn's windpipe to give surfactant—a medicine that helps their lungs work better. It will help doctors understand which method is safer and easier for babies needing this treatment.

This trial compares video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for placing breathing tubes in patients. It tests which method works better for first-year anesthesia residents during training.

This trial compares two types of video laryngoscopes (visionPRO and Glidescope) to see if one is as good as the other for placing a breathing tube during surgery. If you are having planned surgery with general anesthesia and need a breathing tube, you may be able to join.

This study looks at the forces doctors use when inserting a breathing tube into a newborn baby. It tests if changing the height of the resuscitation table affects these forces. This may help find a safer way to intubate and reduce injury risks.

This trial compares two methods—videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy—for placing a breathing tube in newborns who need help breathing during surgery or in the intensive care unit.

This study compares two ways of placing a breathing tube in children during surgery: using a video camera laryngoscope or a standard direct laryngoscope. If your child is having a planned surgery and needs a breathing tube, this trial may help determine which method is safer and easier.