Clin2
NCT06972797Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Comparing Computer Methods for Measuring Upper Canine Teeth

Impacted Canines

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two computer methods for measuring an upper canine tooth that has not come in properly. It uses a 3D scanning tool to see which method gives more accurate results and could help dentists plan better treatments.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
21 people
Ages
8 years to 70 years
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are between 8 and 70 years old, with a specific age depending on the tooth type (8 to less than 15 for unerupted, or 15 to 70 for impacted).
  • You have a maxillary canine (upper eye tooth) that is either still under the gum (unerupted) or stuck and not coming in normally (impacted).
  • Your dental scan must clearly show that tooth, with no blurry or distorted areas that could block the view.
  • Your scan cannot have fractures, cysts, or other damage in the area that would make the tooth hard to measure.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06833034Recruiting
New technique for impacted upper canine teeth

This trial tests a new method to expose an upper canine tooth that is stuck behind the other teeth (palatally impacted). If you have one impacted canine on one side and it's not too high or angled, this study may compare a newer, less invasive exposure technique to the standard approach.

Lund, Skåne County
NCT07065487Recruiting
Comparing two digital scanning methods for full-arch implant teeth

This trial tests two different ways of taking digital scans of the mouth to make a full set of teeth supported by four implants in the lower jaw. It compares a standard scanning method with a new pattern-assisted technique to see which is more accurate.

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
NCT07723404Recruiting
Comparing two ways to scan dental implants for a new bridge

This trial compares two techniques for scanning dental implants in the upper jaw to make a new permanent bridge or denture. It aims to find which method gives a more accurate fit.

Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom
NCT07740265Recruiting
Scanning methods for accurate jaw implants

This study compares different dental scanning techniques to see which one helps make more accurate replacement teeth for people without any natural teeth. It aims to improve how well permanent implants and their attachments fit.

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate
NCT06846619Recruiting
Testing two ways to make 3D-printed dentures

This study compares two methods for making 3D-printed dentures to see which patients like better. It aims to find which technique is more comfortable and satisfying.

Cairo
NCT07643441Recruiting
Testing digital scanning accuracy for full-arch dental implants

This study tests how accurately a digital scanning method (photogrammetry) can measure and plan treatment for patients with implant-supported full-mouth dental replacements. If you have multiple dental implants supporting a complete denture or bridge, researchers want to see if this scanning technique gives reliable measurements to help design better-fitting prosthetics.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia

Hear when a new Impacted Canines trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.