Clin2
NCT07200440Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing 3D scanning methods for full-arch implants

Accuracy of Different Scanning Techniques

This trial tests how well three different scanning techniques capture the position of implants in a full-arch model. It aims to find which method is most accurate for planning dental implant treatments.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
24 people
Ages
Any age
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have a model of a mouth with no teeth and implants placed in standard positions.
  • You can use the special scan bodies needed for each of the three scanning methods.
  • Your model is not broken or irregular.
  • Your implants are placed at consistent angles.
  • Your scan bodies and equipment are in good condition.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07065487Recruiting
Comparing two digital scanning methods for full-arch implant teeth

This trial tests two different ways of taking digital scans of the mouth to make a full set of teeth supported by four implants in the lower jaw. It compares a standard scanning method with a new pattern-assisted technique to see which is more accurate.

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
NCT06570499Recruiting
Comparing dental impression methods for full-arch implants

This trial compares three ways to take dental impressions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses: traditional putty, intraoral scanning, and digital photogrammetry. It aims to find which method is most accurate, which could help improve comfort and fit for people with multiple dental implants.

Liège, Liege
NCT07446790Recruiting
Comparing two digital methods for full-arch implant bridges

This trial tests a faster digital scanning method using a special camera (photogrammetry) versus a standard intraoral scanner for making a full set of implant-supported teeth. It aims to see which method leads to fewer problems with the final restoration.

Cairo
NCT07740265Recruiting
Scanning methods for accurate jaw implants

This study compares different dental scanning techniques to see which one helps make more accurate replacement teeth for people without any natural teeth. It aims to improve how well permanent implants and their attachments fit.

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate
NCT07723404Recruiting
Comparing two ways to scan dental implants for a new bridge

This trial compares two techniques for scanning dental implants in the upper jaw to make a new permanent bridge or denture. It aims to find which method gives a more accurate fit.

Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom
NCT07643441Recruiting
Testing digital scanning accuracy for full-arch dental implants

This study tests how accurately a digital scanning method (photogrammetry) can measure and plan treatment for patients with implant-supported full-mouth dental replacements. If you have multiple dental implants supporting a complete denture or bridge, researchers want to see if this scanning technique gives reliable measurements to help design better-fitting prosthetics.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia

Hear when a new Accuracy of Different Scanning Techniques trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.