Clin2
NCT07235072Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing three methods for fitting upper dental implants

Passive Fit of Full-arch Implant Prostheses

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares three ways of making a full set of upper teeth on dental implants. It aims to find which method gives the best fit and saves time, which may mean fewer visits and a more comfortable final result.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
14 people
Ages
45 years to 65 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 45 and 65 years old.
  • You are missing all or most of your upper teeth and need a full arch of replacement teeth (not just a few teeth).
  • You have enough bone in your upper jaw to support at least 4 dental implants without needing major bone grafting.
  • You are generally healthy, with no serious conditions like uncontrolled diabetes, severe bone-weakening disease, or a weakened immune system.
  • You do not smoke more than 10 cigarettes a day.
  • You are willing to keep up with good oral hygiene and attend regular follow-up visits.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07550725Recruiting
Full Arch Dental Implant Impressions Study

This study tests different techniques for taking accurate impressions (molds) of your upper jaw when preparing for full-arch dental implants (a fixed bridge supported by implants). The goal is to improve the fit and success of your final implant-supported teeth.

Giza
NCT07723404Recruiting
Comparing two ways to scan dental implants for a new bridge

This trial compares two techniques for scanning dental implants in the upper jaw to make a new permanent bridge or denture. It aims to find which method gives a more accurate fit.

Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom
NCT07446790Recruiting
Comparing two digital methods for full-arch implant bridges

This trial tests a faster digital scanning method using a special camera (photogrammetry) versus a standard intraoral scanner for making a full set of implant-supported teeth. It aims to see which method leads to fewer problems with the final restoration.

Cairo
NCT05332977Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to make implant-supported upper dentures

This study compares two different methods for making upper dentures that are anchored on dental implants. The goal is to see which procedure is more effective and has fewer complications for people who are missing all their upper teeth.

Pune
NCT07778199Recruiting
Implant denture fitting: digital vs traditional dental impressions

This trial compares two ways of taking dental impressions (molds) for making a full-arch implant-supported denture. One method uses a digital scanner, the other uses traditional dental putty. The goal is to see if one results in a more comfortable and precise fit.

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
NCT07200440Not yet recruiting
Comparing scanning methods for full-arch dental implants

This study compares three different ways of taking digital impressions for full-arch dental implants to see which is most accurate. It's about improving the fit and precision of implant-supported teeth, which could lead to better outcomes for patients.

Hear when a new Passive Fit of Full-arch Implant Prostheses trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.