Clin2
NCT07238738Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two implant placement techniques after tooth removal

Non-restorable Posterior TeethThin Buccal Bone PlateBuccal Bone Fenestraion

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after removing a damaged back tooth. One method leaves the gums undisturbed, the other uses a small gum modification. The goal is to see which approach gives better healing and long-term success.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
20 years to 50 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Be between 20 and 50 years old, male or female.
  • Have at least one back tooth that is beyond saving and must be removed.
  • Be in good overall health, with no serious untreated conditions.
  • Have enough healthy bone in the jaw to support a dental implant.
  • Have thick gums and enough attached gum tissue.
  • Not be pregnant or nursing.
  • Not be a heavy smoker (no more than a pack a day).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06307691Recruiting
Comparing two implant placement methods after tooth removal

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.

Cairo
NCT07449806Recruiting
Comparing two bone graft materials for front tooth implants

This trial looks at two different types of bone graft material used when placing a dental implant right after removing a front tooth. It aims to see which one better maintains the thickness of the bone on the lip side of the implant.

Alexandria
NCT07863700Recruiting
Immediate implant placement accuracy after tooth extraction

This study tests how accurate dental implants are when placed immediately after removing a lower back tooth. It aims to see if this approach works well and helps patients get a stable new tooth quickly.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia
NCT06207617Recruiting
Immediate implant after molar removal: with or without bone graft

This study tests whether placing a dental implant right after removing a lower molar works better with or without adding a bone graft. It looks at how the bone and gum change over time.

Cairo
NCT07115758Not yet recruiting
Flap design comparison for immediate dental implants

This trial compares two ways of placing an immediate dental implant in the upper front area after a failing tooth is removed. The goal is to see which technique preserves the gum and bone better for a natural look.

Cairo, New Cairo
NCT07761442Recruiting
Comparing two methods for placing dental implants right after tooth removal

This study tests two ways of placing a dental implant immediately after pulling a tooth to see which one better preserves the bone and gum. It might help people who need a front tooth replaced and want to keep the area looking natural.

Minya

Hear when a new Non-restorable Posterior Teeth trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.