Clin2
NCT06307691Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two implant placement methods after tooth removal

Implant Complication

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
26 people
Ages
20 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You need to have a single tooth (front tooth or premolar) that must be removed.
  • Your age must be between 20 and 60 years old.
  • The bone on the cheek side of the tooth must be intact after the tooth is taken out.
  • You must be in good overall health (no uncontrolled diabetes or other bone-healing conditions).
  • You cannot smoke more than 5 cigarettes a day, be pregnant or nursing, or have severe gum disease.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06599112Recruiting
Dental implant stability with different bone drilling methods

This study compares three ways of preparing the jawbone for a dental implant in the upper back area. The goal is to see which technique makes the implant most stable right after placement and over time.

Giza
NCT07238738Not yet recruiting
Comparing two dental implant methods

This trial tests a new surgical technique for placing a dental implant immediately after a tooth is removed. It may be an option for people who need a back tooth replaced and have good overall health.

Al Mansurah
NCT06590753Recruiting
Comparing two implant methods for lower denture support

This study compares two different ways of placing dental implants to hold a lower denture (overdenture). One method is a newer 'osseodensification' technique that helps make the bone denser around the implant, while the other is the standard drilling approach. The goal is to see which method gives better results for people who need a stable, implant-supported denture.

Cairo
NCT07761442Recruiting
Comparing two methods for placing dental implants right after tooth removal

This study tests two ways of placing a dental implant immediately after pulling a tooth to see which one better preserves the bone and gum. It might help people who need a front tooth replaced and want to keep the area looking natural.

Minya
NCT06992557Not yet recruiting
Comparing two drilling methods for jaw implants

This study compares two different drilling methods used during dental implant surgery to see which one is better. If you need a dental implant in your lower jaw (back teeth area) and are in good health, you may be able to join.

Cairo
NCT07449806Recruiting
Comparing two bone graft materials for front tooth implants

This trial looks at two different types of bone graft material used when placing a dental implant right after removing a front tooth. It aims to see which one better maintains the thickness of the bone on the lip side of the implant.

Alexandria

Hear when a new Implant Complication trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.