Clin2
NCT07291336Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two ways to place dental implants

Healthy AdultsDental ImplantAccuracy

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two methods for placing dental implants in the upper jaw: dynamic navigation (real-time guidance) versus static navigation (using a surgical guide). It aims to see which technique is more accurate for people missing one tooth between the right and left second premolars.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
22 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are at least 22 years old and in good general health.
  • You are missing at least one tooth in the upper jaw, between your right and left second premolars.
  • You have at least six teeth remaining in your upper jaw.
  • You have at least 5 mm of bone available at the implant site.
  • You do not have any medical condition or take medication that would slow bone healing.
  • You are not pregnant, do not smoke more than 10 cigarettes daily, and do not have uncontrolled high blood pressure or diabetes.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06967090Not yet recruiting
AI-guided implant placement versus the standard technique

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants in the back of the jaw. One method uses artificial intelligence (a computer program) to plan the implant position; the other uses a traditional, non-AI approach. The goal is to see if the AI-guided placement is more accurate, which may lead to better results.

NCT06764654Recruiting
Comparing two guided surgery methods for back jaw implants

This study compares two types of guided surgery methods for placing dental implants in the back of the jaw (where there are missing teeth). It aims to find which technique works better for patients who need implants in that area.

Alicante, Alicante
NCT05843981Not yet recruiting
Comparison of two methods for placing dental implants

This study compares two different ways to place dental implants in people who are missing at least two teeth. It aims to see which method works better for long-term success.

Sassari
NCT07512258Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to place dental implants for better healing

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants to see which one is more accurate and helps you heal better. It is for people who need a single tooth replaced with an implant.

Birmingham, Alabama
NCT06910007Not yet recruiting
Testing software for guided dental implant placement

This study tests different computer software programs used to plan dental implant surgery. It aims to see which software is most accurate, which could lead to better outcomes for patients needing implants.

NCT07518615Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of Guided Dental Implant Surgery System

This trial tests a new computer-guided system (Straumann Dynamic Navigation Falcon) that helps dentists place dental implants more precisely. If you need one or more dental implants and have healthy gums and jaw, this study may help determine if this guided approach is safe and works well.

Ghent

Hear when a new Dental Implant trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.