Clin2
NCT06967090Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

AI-guided implant placement versus the standard technique

Dental Implant

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants in the back of the jaw. One method uses artificial intelligence (a computer program) to plan the implant position; the other uses a traditional, non-AI approach. The goal is to see if the AI-guided placement is more accurate, which may lead to better results.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
18 years to 75 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have one or more missing back teeth (molars or premolars) that need dental implants.
  • Your missing tooth area has healed for at least 3 months after the tooth was removed.
  • Your jawbone in the implant area has enough height and width (at least 10 mm height and 6 mm width).
  • You are in good health overall, without conditions that could affect bone healing.
  • You are a non-smoker, do not drink alcohol, and have no jaw joint problems or grinding habits.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06910007Not yet recruiting
Testing software for guided dental implant placement

This study tests different computer software programs used to plan dental implant surgery. It aims to see which software is most accurate, which could lead to better outcomes for patients needing implants.

NCT06764654Recruiting
Comparing two guided surgery methods for back jaw implants

This study compares two types of guided surgery methods for placing dental implants in the back of the jaw (where there are missing teeth). It aims to find which technique works better for patients who need implants in that area.

Alicante, Alicante
NCT07291336Recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing two ways to place dental implants

This trial compares two methods for placing dental implants in the upper jaw: dynamic navigation (real-time guidance) versus static navigation (using a surgical guide). It aims to see which technique is more accurate for people missing one tooth between the right and left second premolars.

Cairo
NCT07512258Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to place dental implants for better healing

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants to see which one is more accurate and helps you heal better. It is for people who need a single tooth replaced with an implant.

Birmingham, Alabama
NCT05843981Not yet recruiting
Comparison of two methods for placing dental implants

This study compares two different ways to place dental implants in people who are missing at least two teeth. It aims to see which method works better for long-term success.

Sassari
NCT06819995Recruiting
3D-printed vs milled guides for dental implants

This study compares two types of surgical guides used to place dental implants: one made with a 3D printer and one milled from a solid block. If you're missing one to four teeth and have healthy healed gums and bone, this trial may help determine which guide works best.

Madrid

Hear when a new Dental Implant trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.