Clin2
NCT07408999Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways of minimally invasive esophagus surgery for cancer

Resecable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

Part of Cancer clinical trials.

This trial compares two types of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer to see which is better. It is for people whose cancer can be removed with surgery and who are healthy enough for either approach.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
327 people
Ages
18 years to 80 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 80 years old
  • You have squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the middle or lower esophagus or the area where the esophagus meets the stomach (types Siewert 1 or 2)
  • Your cancer has not spread to other organs (stage M0) and is considered curable with surgery
  • You are well enough to have surgery (performance status 0, 1, or 2) and your general health is acceptable (if 70-80, a special score or doctor's okay is needed)
  • You have not had major abdominal or right chest surgery in the past, and you do not have serious heart, lung, or liver problems
  • You are willing and able to follow study visits and procedures

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04306458Recruiting
Testing robot-assisted vs standard surgery for resectable esophageal cancer

This trial compares a robot-assisted approach to a standard minimally invasive approach for surgery in people with certain types of esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer that can be removed. It aims to see which surgery method works better and is safer for these patients.

Mainz
NCT06162767Recruiting
Surgery comparison for junction cancer

This trial compares two surgical techniques for treating a specific type of cancer at the junction of the stomach and esophagus. It aims to find which surgery offers better outcomes for patients.

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT06012214Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgeries for esophageal cancer after pre-treatment

This trial compares two different surgical approaches for people with esophageal cancer who have already received treatment like chemo or radiation before surgery. It aims to see which method works better and is safer.

Shanghai
NCT05205343Recruiting
Compare minimally invasive and full stomach surgery for upper cancer

This study compares two minimally invasive ways to operate on the stomach area for cancers near the stomach and esophagus (GEJ). It looks at whether one surgical approach is better for long-term outcomes when the goal is cure.

Rochester, Minnesota
NCT06644352Recruiting
Comparing right vs. left chest surgery for junction cancer

This study compares two surgical approaches (right side of the chest vs. left side of the chest) for removing a certain type of cancer at the gastroesophageal junction. It aims to find which approach leads to better outcomes.

Beijing
NCT07482566Recruiting
Comparing two surgeries for advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer

This trial compares two types of stomach-removing surgeries (total vs. partial gastrectomy) in people with a certain kind of advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer. The goal is to find out which surgery leads to better outcomes.

Istanbul, Istanbul

Hear when a new Resecable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.