Clin2
NCT07448701Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two cementing methods for zirconia bridges on dental implants

Biomechanical PhenomenaPartial Edentulism

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study tests two ways of attaching a zirconia (a strong, tooth-colored material) bridge to dental implants – one method cements the bridge inside the mouth, the other outside – to see which puts less stress on the implants. If you already have two implants and need a bridge, this trial might help determine the best way to attach it for long-term success.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be at least 18 years old and in good general health.
  • You need a gap of one or more missing teeth that can be restored with a three-unit bridge supported by two dental implants.
  • You must already have two dental implants (specifically Klockner Essential Cone implants) that have fully healed and fused with the bone.
  • You cannot have severe health conditions (like ASA III or IV) or a history of taking bisphosphonate bone medications.
  • You should smoke no more than 10 cigarettes a day.
  • You should not have active gum disease or recent healing issues in the area.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04927819Recruiting
Extra-short versus standard dental implants in a fixed bridge

This study compares extra-short dental implants versus standard-length implants when they are joined together in the same fixed bridge. It may help people understand which implant type works better for supporting a stable multi-tooth replacement.

Vitoria-Gasteiz
NCT04713800Recruiting
Dental implant bridge comparison with two implant types

This trial tests two ways of making a small back teeth bridge (a “cantilever” dental implant crown) using different materials. It may help show which material works best when replacing missing back teeth with implant support.

Geneva
NCT07657364Recruiting
Comparing zirconia vs titanium for full-arch dental implants

This study compares two types of material (zirconia or titanium) used as a frame in full-arch screw-retained implant bridges. It aims to find which material has fewer complications, helps patients who have lost all teeth in one or both jaws.

Cairo
NCT07029880Recruiting
Comparing two types of porcelain for metal-ceramic dental bridges

This study compares two different porcelain materials used to make metal-ceramic dental bridges, to see which works better. It may help you get a stronger, longer-lasting bridge.

Cairo
NCT07007572Recruiting· Phase 2
Comparing new tooth implants with different materials

This trial compares two types of tooth implant materials for replacing a missing lower back tooth. It looks at bone health and biting strength to see which material works better.

Cairo, Cairo Governorate
NCT07811661Recruiting
Comparing two materials for full-arch teeth replacement in lower jaw

This study compares two different materials for a full-arch hybrid prosthesis (a fixed set of teeth) supported by four implants in the lower jaw. The goal is to see which material keeps bacteria from sticking and keeps the gums around the implants healthier.

Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate

Hear when a new Partial Edentulism trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.