Clin2
NCT07463261Possibly a fitRecruiting

Rectal cancer surgery: with or without a temporary stoma

TMERectal Cancer SurgeryLow Rectal CancerMiddle Rectal CancerLocal Advanced Rectal Cancer

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of doing rectal cancer surgery: one with a temporary stoma (a bag on the belly) and one without. It aims to see if a stoma helps prevent complications after the bowel is reconnected.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
442 people
Ages
18 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 to 79 years old.
  • You have rectal cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body.
  • Your surgeon plans to remove the cancer with a minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) surgery and reconnect the bowel.
  • You do not already have a stoma (colostomy or ileostomy).
  • Your blood tests show adequate kidney, liver, and blood cell function.
  • You have a low risk of the new connection leaking (based on a scoring system used by your doctor).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06214988Recruiting
Temporary stoma or not for rectal cancer surgery

This trial tests whether a temporary stoma (a bag on the belly) can be safely avoided in some people having rectal cancer surgery. The goal is to see if it's okay to skip the stoma in those with a low risk of complications.

Malmö
NCT05853094Recruiting
Testing different ways to create a stoma after rectal cancer surgery

This trial looks at how different stoma (opening in the belly) approaches affect recovery after curative rectal cancer surgery. It may help doctors choose the safest, most comfortable option for bowel function and healing after surgery.

Shanghai
NCT07369531Recruiting
Stoma-free survival after new anal-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer

This study compares a two-stage surgical technique (Turnbull-Cutait pull-through) to standard surgery for people with low rectal cancer. The goal is to see which approach helps more patients avoid a permanent stoma (bag) after surgery.

Changchun, Jilin
NCT02966483Recruiting
Transanal or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

This trial compares two surgical approaches to remove rectal cancer tissue while aiming to preserve cure chances. It may help you see which approach fits your tumor location and health situation best.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT06225609Not yet recruiting
No Stoma vs Ghost Stoma for Rectal Cancer Surgery

This study compares two approaches during rectal cancer surgery: either no stoma (a temporary opening in the belly for waste) or a ghost ileostomy (a loop of intestine that is tied off underneath the skin). The goal is to see which option leads to fewer complications after total mesorectal excision, a standard surgery for rectal cancer.

NCT04098471Recruiting
Comparing two rectal cancer surgeries for T2 tumors

This trial compares two different surgery approaches for early-stage rectal cancer (T2N0M0) that is close to the anus. It tests whether a less invasive local removal followed by radiation works as well as more extensive surgery (total mesorectal excision).

Nanjing, Jiangsu

Hear when a new Rectal Cancer Surgery trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.