Clin2
NCT07571447Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two sedation methods for heart shock treatment

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Atrial Flutter

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two types of sedation (midazolam given by a heart doctor versus propofol given by an anesthesia specialist) during a procedure to restore a normal heart rhythm in people with atrial fibrillation or flutter. It aims to find which approach is safer and more comfortable for patients.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
220 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have atrial fibrillation or flutter (an irregular or rapid heartbeat).
  • You are scheduled for a procedure called cardioversion, which uses a shock to bring your heart back to a normal rhythm.
  • You are expected to be able to go home the same day after the procedure (within 8 hours).
  • You do not have severe lung disease, unstable blood pressure, or a body mass index over 40.
  • You are not pregnant or breastfeeding, and you have no blood clot in your heart.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07621432Not yet recruiting
Deep sedation vs. general anesthesia for heart procedure

This study compares two types of sedation for people having a catheter procedure to treat atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). It helps find which approach works better for comfort and safety.

Nanchang, Jiangxi
NCT07734194Recruiting
Studying a new sedation combo for afib treatment

This trial tests a mild sedation method using remimazolam and fentanyl during a procedure called pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation (afib). It aims to find a safe and effective way to keep you comfortable without deep sedation.

Prague
NCT07633548Enrolling by invitation
Simplified sedation protocol for heart rhythm ablation

This trial tests a streamlined sedation approach during pulsed-field ablation, a newer technique to treat irregular heartbeat (atrial fibrillation). Researchers want to confirm it's safe and practical.

Caen
NCT07569016Recruiting
Monitoring Brain Activity During Heart Rhythm Treatment

This trial compares two ways of giving sedation (sleepy medicine) during a procedure to restore normal heart rhythm in people with atrial fibrillation. One method uses a special brain monitor to guide sedation doses, while the other uses standard clinical judgment. The goal is to see if the brain monitor helps keep you safer and more comfortable.

Istanbul
NCT06700681Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two sedatives for heart ablation procedures

This trial compares two sedative medicines (remimazolam and propofol) given during heart ablation procedures. The study uses brain-wave monitoring to see which medicine provides better sedation and recovery. It's for people who are already scheduled for this procedure with a specific doctor.

Taipei
NCT07561970Recruiting
Comparing two anesthesia drugs during heart rhythm procedures

This study compares two commonly used anesthesia medications (propofol and sevoflurane) in patients having a procedure to treat irregular heartbeats. Researchers want to see which drug works better and is safer for keeping you asleep during the procedure.

Brussels

Hear when a new Atrial Flutter trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.