Comparing two tooth-colored fillings for back tooth cavities
Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares two types of tooth-colored filling materials for cavities on the chewing surface of back teeth. It aims to see which one works better for simple cavities that haven't reached the nerve.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have a simple cavity on the chewing surface of a back tooth (molar).
- The cavity is at an early to moderate stage, not too deep or close to the nerve.
- Your tooth is healthy and not previously root-treated.
- You have good oral hygiene and are willing to attend follow-up visits.
- You have proper teeth alignment and a normal bite.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two types of tooth-colored filling materials used to repair cavities in back teeth. The goal is to see which material works better and lasts longer, helping you keep your natural teeth healthy.
This study compares two types of tooth-colored fillings (inlays) for large cavities in back teeth. One is made from a hard ceramic-like material made by a computer, and the other is a composite resin filling placed by hand. The goal is to see which one lasts better and works best for repairing big cavities.
This study compares a newer type of tooth-colored filling material (called bulk-fill composite) to standard fillings for cavities in back teeth. It tests how well the fillings hold up over time, which could help you get a filling that lasts longer.
This trial compares two types of tooth-colored fillings for teeth with deep cavities that extend below the gumline. One filling material is designed to release minerals to help protect the tooth, while the other is a standard strong resin. The goal is to see which material works better for this kind of repair.
This study tests a new self-hardening filling material against a light-activated bioactive filling for cavities between back teeth. The goal is to see which material works better and lasts longer.
This trial compares two tooth-colored filling materials for children's back teeth (molars). One is a thicker, packable paste; the other is a thinner, flowable composite that can be injected. The goal is to see which filling performs better over time in terms of durability and gum health.
Hear when a new Caries Class I trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.