Clin2
NCT07601347Possibly a fitRecruiting

Immediate dental implants: two loading methods compared

Other Endosseous Dental Implant Failure

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of placing and loading dental implants for damaged upper back teeth. Researchers will test whether a newer compression technique works as well as or better than the standard method for tooth replacement and bone healing.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
20 years to 40 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 20 and 40 years old
  • You have one or more badly damaged upper back teeth (premolars) that need implants
  • Your jawbone is healthy enough and thick enough to support an implant
  • You do not smoke or are a non-smoker
  • You are generally healthy with no uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, or vitamin D deficiency
  • The tooth or root remaining does not sit in an awkward position that would prevent implant placement

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07374627Not yet recruiting
Immediate dental implant after extracting a front tooth

This study tests whether removing a failing front tooth and inserting a dental implant immediately (in the same visit) is safe and effective. If you qualify, you might get a new tooth in one procedure instead of waiting for healing.

Cairo
NCT07761442Recruiting
Comparing two methods for placing dental implants right after tooth removal

This study tests two ways of placing a dental implant immediately after pulling a tooth to see which one better preserves the bone and gum. It might help people who need a front tooth replaced and want to keep the area looking natural.

Minya
NCT07658144Enrolling by invitation
Immediate dental implant for upper back teeth

This trial tests a new way to place a dental implant right away after removing a damaged upper molar. It aims to see if placing the implant using the tooth's natural root as a guide is accurate and effective.

Tanta
NCT07238738Not yet recruiting
Comparing two implant placement techniques after tooth removal

This study compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after removing a damaged back tooth. One method leaves the gums undisturbed, the other uses a small gum modification. The goal is to see which approach gives better healing and long-term success.

Al Mansurah
NCT07498556Not yet recruiting
Immediate dental implants with strong initial stability

This study tests whether placing a dental implant right after tooth removal and attaching a temporary crown works well when the implant is very secure from the start. It may help people who need one or more implants and want a faster approach to replacing missing teeth.

Porto
NCT06526351Recruiting
Early implant with immediate vs. conventional loading

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant after a tooth is removed in the front upper jaw. One group gets the new tooth placed right away (immediate loading), and the other group waits a few months. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and long-term success.

Belgrade

Hear when a new Other Endosseous Dental Implant Failure trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.