Clin2
NCT07697677Possibly a fitRecruiting

Mini versus standard surgery for complex kidney stones

Kidney StonesComplex Renal Calculi

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to surgically remove large or complex kidney stones. It tests whether a less invasive approach works as well as the standard surgery, with the goal of reducing recovery time and complications.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,380 people
Ages
18 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have a complex kidney stone (large, in multiple parts, or shaped like a staghorn).
  • Your kidney function is fairly good (creatinine level is not too high).
  • You are in generally stable health (able to handle surgery).
  • You do not have a solitary kidney, severe obesity, or an active infection.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07159503Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two procedures for 2-4cm kidney stones

This trial compares two methods to remove kidney stones that are 2-4 cm in size: one uses a thin tube through a small cut in your back (VISOR), and the other uses a larger cut (PCNL). The goal is to see which approach works better and has fewer side effects.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang
NCT07798336Not yet recruiting
Comparing two sizes of scopes for kidney stone removal

This study compares two sizes of flexible ureteroscopes (small tubes used to remove kidney stones) to see if a thinner one is just as safe and effective as a slightly thicker one. You might join if you're having a ureteroscopy for small kidney stones.

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
NCT07306819Recruiting
Two kidney stone removal methods compared

This study compares two ways to remove kidney stones: mini-PCNL (a small incision in your back) versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath (a tube through the urinary tract). It aims to find which method works better and is safer for stones of this size.

Cairo
NCT07749807Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove kidney stones through a small back incision

This study compares two methods for removing kidney stones when they are too large or complex for other treatments. Both methods use a small cut in the back to reach the kidney, and the goal is to find which approach works better with fewer complications.

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate
NCT07753733Recruiting
Comparing one versus multiple tunnels for complex kidney stone removal

This trial compares two ways to remove complex kidney stones through a small cut in the back. It uses a special scope to see inside the kidney, and some patients get one or multiple small tunnels to reach the stones. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective.

Cairo
NCT07322471Not yet recruiting
Comparing two procedures for large kidney stones

This study compares two ways to remove large staghorn kidney stones: one uses a thin scope through the urinary tract, the other uses a small cut in the back to reach the kidney directly. The goal is to see which method is safer and works better for patients.

Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia

Hear when a new Kidney Stones trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.