Clin2
NCT07306819Possibly a fitRecruiting

Two kidney stone removal methods compared

Stone;RenalStone, UrinaryStone, KidneyStone Clearance

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to remove kidney stones: mini-PCNL (a small incision in your back) versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath (a tube through the urinary tract). It aims to find which method works better and is safer for stones of this size.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
120 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years old or older.
  • You have one or more kidney stones that are between 2 and 3 cm in size (measured by CT scan).
  • You are not pregnant.
  • You do not have an active urinary tract infection.
  • You do not have a bleeding disorder or uncontrolled blood clotting problem.
  • You do not have a kidney shape abnormality (like horseshoe kidney) or a blockage at the kidney-ureter connection.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07295860Not yet recruiting
Comparing two keyhole surgeries for medium kidney stones

This trial compares two minimally invasive surgeries for removing kidney stones that are 2–3 cm in size. One uses a special vacuum to help clear stone fragments, and the other uses suction. Both are done through a small tube in the back, and the goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective.

Al Mansurah, Outside U.S./Canada
NCT07763743Recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone removal methods

This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove small-to-medium kidney stones (1 to 2.5 cm). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective, possibly leading to quicker recovery and fewer side effects.

Cairo, Abbasia
NCT07749807Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove kidney stones through a small back incision

This study compares two methods for removing kidney stones when they are too large or complex for other treatments. Both methods use a small cut in the back to reach the kidney, and the goal is to find which approach works better with fewer complications.

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate
NCT07689565Not yet recruiting
Comparing two tools for kidney stone surgery in children

This study compares two types of ureteral access sheaths used during flexible ureterorenoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure to remove kidney stones smaller than 2 cm in children. The goal is to see which tool works better and is safer for your child.

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate
NCT07855354Recruiting
Kidney stone surgery: comparing two access points

This study compares two ways to reach kidney stones during a surgery called percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The purpose is to see if one method is safer or works better than the other, which may help reduce complications and improve recovery.

Cairo
NCT07322471Not yet recruiting
Comparing two procedures for large kidney stones

This study compares two ways to remove large staghorn kidney stones: one uses a thin scope through the urinary tract, the other uses a small cut in the back to reach the kidney directly. The goal is to see which method is safer and works better for patients.

Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia

Hear when a new Stone;Renal trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.